Volume 70, Page 380 View pdf image (33K) |
380 Provincial Court Proceedings, 1683. Liber W. C. Said bill, Nor hath the said Nicholas payd the same to the said Thomas in his said Capacity since the death of the said Richard, but the same to the said Richard in his life time or to the said Thomas in his said Capacity since the death of the said Richard to pay and satisfy although often demanded hath denyed and still doth denye, To the damage of the said Thomas in his said Capacity ffive thousand pounds of tobacco And thereupon he brings his suite And here in Court produces his Letters Testamentary Whereby &c. And the said Nicholas Hackett by Robert Carvile his Attorney cometh and defendeth the force and injury when &c. And prayeth liberty to imparle hereunto untill the next Provinciall Court And it is granted unto her, and the same day is given to the plt also: Now here at this day to wit the second day of July in the Eighth yeare of the Dominion of the Right honoble Charles Lord Balte more &c Annoq Doni 1683 came the said partyes by their Attor neys aforesaid And the said Nicholas Hackett by his said Attorney sayth that he with the debt aforesaid in the Declaration mentioned ought not to be burthened, because he sayth the bill or writeing obligatory in the Declaration aforesaid mentioned is not his act and deed And of this he putts himself upon the Country And the plt likewise, Therefore it is comanded the sheriffe of st Maries County that he Cause to come here Twelve &c. by whome &c. and Who neither &c. to recognize &c. because aswell &c: On wch said second day of July in the yeare aforesaid Came the partyes aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid And the Jurors im pannelled being called likewise came (to wit) Philip Lynes, Richard Keene, John Hungerford, Richard Royston, John Power, Samll Dobson, John Wilkinson Thomas Stonestreet, James Phillips. Stephen Murty, Dennis Hurley & Hugh Hopewell, Who being elected tryed and Sworne to say the truth in the premisses Upon p. 708 their Oathes doe say, That the bill or writeing obligatory in the Declaracon aforesaid mentioned is not the act and deed of the said Nicholas Hackett. Itt is therefore considered by the Court here that the said Thomas ffisher ffisher Admr as aforesaid take nothing by his writ aforesaid but be in mercy for his false Clayme therein and that the said Nicholas Hackett goe thereof without day Raymond Stapleford Thomas Cooke late of Dorchester County agt otherwise Called Thomas Cooke of the Thomas Cooke County of Dorchester in the Province of Maryland gentl was sumoned to answere unto Raymond Stapleford of a plea that he render unto him Twenty and two pounds six shillings and tenn pence sterling money of England to him he oweth and unjustly detaineth And whereupon the said Raymond Stapleford by Robert Carvile his Attorney Complaineth That whereas the said Thomas Cooke |
||||
Volume 70, Page 380 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.