| Volume 70, Page 380 View pdf image (33K) |
380 Provincial Court Proceedings, 1683.
Liber W. C. Said bill, Nor hath the said Nicholas payd the same to the said
Thomas in his said Capacity since the death of the said Richard,
but the same to the said Richard in his life time or to the said
Thomas in his said Capacity since the death of the said Richard
to pay and satisfy although often demanded hath denyed and still
doth denye, To the damage of the said Thomas in his said Capacity
ffive thousand pounds of tobacco And thereupon he brings his suite
And here in Court produces his Letters Testamentary Whereby &c.
And the said Nicholas Hackett by Robert Carvile his Attorney
cometh and defendeth the force and injury when &c. And prayeth
liberty to imparle hereunto untill the next Provinciall Court And
it is granted unto her, and the same day is given to the plt also:
Now here at this day to wit the second day of July in the Eighth
yeare of the Dominion of the Right honoble Charles Lord Balte
more &c Annoq Doni 1683 came the said partyes by their Attor
neys aforesaid And the said Nicholas Hackett by his said Attorney
sayth that he with the debt aforesaid in the Declaration mentioned
ought not to be burthened, because he sayth the bill or writeing
obligatory in the Declaration aforesaid mentioned is not his act
and deed And of this he putts himself upon the Country And the
plt likewise, Therefore it is comanded the sheriffe of st Maries
County that he Cause to come here Twelve &c. by whome &c. and
Who neither &c. to recognize &c. because aswell &c:
On wch said second day of July in the yeare aforesaid Came the
partyes aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid And the Jurors im
pannelled being called likewise came (to wit) Philip Lynes, Richard
Keene, John Hungerford, Richard Royston, John Power, Samll
Dobson, John Wilkinson Thomas Stonestreet, James Phillips.
Stephen Murty, Dennis Hurley & Hugh Hopewell, Who being
elected tryed and Sworne to say the truth in the premisses Upon
p. 708 their Oathes doe say, That the bill or writeing obligatory in the
Declaracon aforesaid mentioned is not the act and deed of the said
Nicholas Hackett. Itt is therefore considered by the Court here that
the said Thomas ffisher ffisher Admr as aforesaid take nothing by
his writ aforesaid but be in mercy for his false Clayme therein
and that the said Nicholas Hackett goe thereof without day
Raymond Stapleford Thomas Cooke late of Dorchester County
agt otherwise Called Thomas Cooke of the
Thomas Cooke County of Dorchester in the Province of
Maryland gentl was sumoned to answere unto
Raymond Stapleford of a plea that he render unto him Twenty
and two pounds six shillings and tenn pence sterling money of
England to him he oweth and unjustly detaineth
And whereupon the said Raymond Stapleford by Robert Carvile
his Attorney Complaineth That whereas the said Thomas Cooke
|
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 70, Page 380 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.