| Volume 70, Page 358 View pdf image (33K) |
358 Provincial Court Proceedings, 1683.
Liber W. C. should such Allegations of matter of fact be Admitted (wch matter
of fact can have noe Tryall but by a Jury) It will follow that there
will be tryails ad Infinitem, and noe Controversie will have any
finall determination, And If the plt would have taken any Advan
tage in this Case he ought to have Challenged the Juror before
he had been sworne as the Law requires
(2dly) As to the second that the Jury found for the deft where
they should have found for the plt contrary to Evidence Records
& Aliegata bene probata The deft sayth that the Law hath soe great
a Veneracon for verdicts given by twelve men that it will not
Admitt of any allegation to the Contrary of what is soe found by
Verdict Haveing its name from Dictum veritatis, the saying of
truth, And for the plt to Question the truth of a Verdict is To be
frivolous and Ought not to be Admitted in Law:
(3dly)--As to the third objection that the Jury were wholly drawne
to bring their Verdict for the deft by misinformation and Allega
tions false and against Records, The Deft Sayth that there is noe
such matter for that the Jury was not informed that the survey
of the Lands in Question Claymed by the pits Lessor called Marron
and the lands the Deft claymes were surveyed as two distinct par-
cells of land at one and the same time and by one and the same
surveyr as the plt hath falsely suggested, But true it is that the deft
did alleadge that the lynes of Marron could in noe wise be intended
to runn over the Creek as was Suggested by the Pit, for that the
same Surveyor the same day layd out the land on the other side the
Creeke for another man (viz) Champ, wch was then made appeare
to the Court and Jury and had been before to the seaverall Juryes
upon the land
(4thly) As to the fourth that the Jury refused to Admit the oath
of Major William Coursey sworne to before the honoble Coll Cour
sey The deft sayth that the said Affidavit produced in Court and
the matter therein contained was to them Declared, And after a
full hearing of either party the said Jurors being upon their oathes
Sworne to try the Matter in Controversie Upon mature Delibera
tion and weying the Allegations of either party ifound for the
Defendt ffor which and for that the statute of the 16th & 17th of
the King that Now is Intituled an Act to prevent Arrests of Judg
ments hath provided that noe Judgment shall be Stayed or Reversed
for any Omission Variance Defects or other matter of like nature
not being against the Right of the matter of the suite, The Deft
Prayeth Judgment together with his Costs and Damages Sustained
Which Reasons And answeares to the reasons aforesaid being
read and Argued and by the Justices here fully understood and
dilligently examined, It seemeth to the same Justices that the first
Reason by the plt in manner aforesaid Assigned, and the matter
therein contained is Sufficient in Law to Arrest Judgment Upon the
|
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 70, Page 358 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.