| Volume 70, Page 133 View pdf image (33K) |
Provincial Court Proceedings, 1681/1682. 133
Attorney aforesaid and according to the act of Assembly in that Liber W. C.
Case made and Provided Intituled an act for appeales and Regulate
ing writts of Error. Offereth to the Court here for Cause and rea
son of her the said Susanna's appealing from the Judgment of the
said Court of Baltemore County aforesaid ffor that ye Record &
Proceedings before Recited are manifestly Erroneous and Coran
Non Judice:
(1st):ffor that the pits by their Declareing that the said Mary have
ing Served the sd susanna the full time of foure yeares as by
Indenture may more at Large appeare, the wch time being Com
pleated and Ended the Eight and Twentyeth day of september then
last past & haveing then at that time Demanded her freedome she
the said Susanna unjustly denyed the same & Wittingly forced the
said Mary without her free will or Consent to Continue in the said
susanna's Service from the Date aforesaid untill the 29th of Decem
ber wch was three compleate Moneths. ffor for wch service she hath
Demanded of the said Susanna the sume of ffoure hundred pounds
of tobacco she unjustly refused to pay The said Susanna Sayth
that the matter in Question arriseing upon the said action is whether
she did unjustly Detaine or not, or whether she was free or not free
or whether there was an Indenture or noe Indenture, & also touch
ing the said Indenture of Servitude whether the same were a good
Indenture & valid in Lawe or not All wch was not within the Juris
diccon of the County Court of Baltemore nor could they hold
plea thereof, and Soe the same matters in the Record aforesaid was
Coram Non ludice
(2dly) She saith that the said pits have not alleadged that they
bring into Court here the said Indenture wch they Ought to have
done that the same might there remaine and the Deft had Oyer
thereof wch is Error
(3dly) Itt doth not appeare that there was any proof made of ye
said Indenture to warrant the Verdict aforesd soe that the Jury
have Judged her free wthout Sufficient Proofe wch is Error
And thereupon the said Susanna for the Causes and reasons
aforesaid prayeth ye Proceedings aforesaid & Judgt thereupon may
be Quashed adnulled and made Voyd & that she unto all wch by
Occasion thereof hath Sustained may be restored
And the said John Nicholls by Robert Ridgely his Attorney p.
cometh and Defendeth the force and Injury when &c and prayeth
Liberty to imparle hereunto untill next Provinciall Court and it is
granted unto him the same day is Given to ye plt also:
Now here att this day (to wit) the seaventh day of March in the
seaventh yeare of the Dominion of the Right honobie Charles Lord
Baltemore &Ca Annoq Dni. 1681 Came the said partyes by their
Attorneys aforesaid And the said John Nicholls by his Said At
torney Sayth: That the appeale of the said Susanna from the
Judgmt of ye County Court of Baltemore County Given on the
|
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 70, Page 133 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.