| Volume 70, Page 110 View pdf image (33K) |
110 Provincial Court Proceedings, 1681.
Liber W. C. presence of the Sheriffe of the said County, wch said sheriffe is
hereby also Impowered and comanded to Sumon and Impannell a
Jury of Twelve good and Lawfull men of the Neighbourhood to
goe upon the said Land, and to sumon and Examine witnesses upon
oath if occasion bee that the truth of the matter and the true bounds
of the said One hundred and thirty Acres of land may be fully Dis
covered, and the said Richard Peacock is hereby Ordered to runn
the Lines according to the Lines and Courtes menconed in the Pat-
tent for the said Land called Maron & also the imaginary Lines and
to Runn out the true Lines of the said Creeke called Champes Creeke,
and to returne a Certificate of his Proceedings herein and a faire plott
of the land in Question and the Creeke aforesaid to the next Pro
vinciall Court to be held att the City of St Maryes the Eight and
Twentyeth Day of ffebruary next attested aswell under the hand and
Seaie of the said surveyor as of the sheriffe and Jurors aforesaid
That Soe his Lopps Justices being fully informed of the truth of the
premisses may doe therein as to Justice Shall appertaine,
Ralph Shaw
agt in Ejectmt November the 19th 1681
Philip Lynes
Came Ralph Shawe by Thomas Burford his Attorney
and Philip Lynes by Robert Carvile his Attorney, Itt is alleadged
that the plt as Lessee of Michael Ashford and Rachell his wife
comenced their accon of Ejectment against the Defendt as Casuall
Ejector and the said Philip Lynes haveing named himself defendant
to Defend his Tytle to a parcell of land lately by him the Lynes
purchased of and from one George Gooderick being part of a greater
Tract of land granted to the said George Gooderick containing six
hundred Acres of land Lyeing next adjoyning to a parcell of land
belonging to the said Michael Ash ford and Rachell his wife in
Right of the said Rachell, and the said Ashfords Land being said to
p. 492 bee bounded on the Line of the said George Goodericks land (that
is to say) where the old bounds of the said George Goodericks land
ends, there the Land of the said Michael Ashfords is to beginn, And
the Difference in question being about the true antient bounds of the
said Goodericks land and it being insisted on by the Attorney for
the said Lynes that according to the old Survey made by W Clarke
the then Surveyor generall and the Quantity or Number of perches
mentioned in the Pattent the Same would not reach to the old bounds
of the said Goodericks land, but there is upon a Resurvey thereof a sur
plussage of land within the said old bounds of the said Goodericks
land, and in wch Surplussage then unknowne to the said Gooderick
on Lands they had cleered Tilled and made a Piantacon, and Lynes
since had obtained his Lopps Speciall warrant of resurvey to take up
the said surplusage, But the said Originall bound trees being fallen
the said Michael Ashford would Notwithstanding beginn the bounds
|
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 70, Page 110 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.