| Volume 67, Preface 22 View pdf image (33K) |
xxii Introduction.
son or sons. He left no will, for his widow was appointed administratrix of
his property and guardian of his heir. Part of the land he left was two thou
sand or more acres on Patuxent River, known as Brooke Court Manor or
Aquasco, and it was this Brooke Court Manor that caused Mrs. Letchworth so
much delay and trouble. When, after her husband's death, she went up river
to it, she found it occupied by Bernard Johnson, a Dutch or German cooper.
She warned Johnson off the land, which he claimed to have bought from John
Abington. He did not leave, so she went there again, about 1673 (post,
p. 423), and took witnesses with her. She summoned Johnson to the house of
William Mills, and there, before two witnesses, forwarned him off the land on
which he lived, “that you may goe now prsently off from itt.” According to the
testimony of one witness, Johnson delivered possession to Mrs. Letchworth,
became her tenant for it, and agreed to pay her rent and to plant some trees on
on it. This may or may not be the fact, but Johnson continued to trouble her
about the land (for more light on Johnson's tenacity, see Johnson v. Abing
ton, Archives LI, 521-526; ibid. LXVI, 389, 452). For that reason, she de
cided to get a settlement of the matter by the Provincial Court. October 6, 1677,
she leased the land of which she had title but no possession, to Edward Ball,
Calvert County planter. By virtue of the lease “the said Edward unto the said
Mannor Messuage & prmisses aforesaid entred & was in possession thereof”,
when, on November 1, 1677, Bernard Johnson “into the said Mannor Messuage
& prmisses... . . . entred, & him from his possessions thereof did eject & other
harmes to him did”. For that damage to him and to the peace of the Proprie
tary, Ball sued Johnson for 20,000 pounds of tobacco. Johnson appeared by
his attorney Christopher Rousby, and asked for and got a continuance until
next court. When, on June 18, 1678, the Court met again, Ball appeared by
his attorney, Robert Carvile, “& offered himself agt the said Bernard Johnson
in the plea aforesaid but the said Bernard although solemnly called came not but
made default. . . .“ Then the Court restored to Ball the manor, messuage
and land for the term of his demise. It awarded him damages also, but be
cause it did not know the amount of the damage done, it gave him a writ of
enquiry of damages, returnable next court. A look ahead into the proceedings
of the next court shows (liber NN, ff. 727-728) that the sheriff of Calvert
County reported on October 8, 1678, that he had given to Mrs. Letchworth
quiet and lawful possession of the disputed land. However, her attorney,
Robert Carvile, reported to the Court that same day that Johnson had forcibly
reentered the land and had kept possession of the messuage and of the dwelling
house. The Court ordered, October 14, 1678, that “any two of the Commis
sionrs of the said County who live neer unto the said land by force compell &
turn the said Bernard Johnson from off the said land, & repossess the said
Elizabeth of the said land & Messuages according to law.” Later, on March
12, 1678/9 the jury summoned to enquire into the damages due to Edward
Ball, Mrs. Letchworth's lessee, because of the acts of Johnson, met according
to summons, and set the amount at 2500 pounds of tobacco, with costs of 1942
pounds (liber NN, if. 812-813). In June 1679, Johnson appeared in court and
when Col. Henry Darnall consented that the judgment for 2500 pounds of
|
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 67, Preface 22 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.