| Volume 67, Page 366 View pdf image (33K) |
366 Provincial Court Proceedings, 1677/8.
Liber N N Whereupon they the said Henry & James say that they are the worse
& have damage to the Value of foure thousand pds of tobacco &
thereupon they bring their suite
And the said Charles James by Christopher Rousby his Attorney
cometh & defendeth the force & injury when &c and prayeth liberty
to imparle hereunto untill next Provinciall Court & itt is granted unto
him, the same day is given to the plaintiffes also
Now here att this day to witt the Seventeenth day of June in the
third yeare of the Dominion of Charles Lord Baltemore &c Annoq
Dni 1678 came the said parties by their Attorneys aforesaid And
the said Charles James by his said Attorney saith, that they the said
Henry & James their accon aforesaid agt him the said Charles ought
not to have, because he saith, that he the said Charles is not guilty
of the trespas aforesaid in manner & forme as the said plaintiffes in
their Declaracon have imposed upon him, & of this he putteth him
self upon the Countrey. And the said Henry Stocket & James Stavely
by George Parker their Attorney say, by any thing before alleadged
p. 397 ought not to be debarred from Haveing their action aforesaid, be
cause they say that the said Charles James is guilty of the trespas
aforesaid in manner & forme as they the said Henry & James in their
said Declaracon have declared, & this they pray may be inquired into
by the Countrey, & the Defendt also. Therefore comand is given
to the Sheriffe of St Maryes County that he cause to come here
twelve &c by whom &c who neither &c to recognize &c because aswell
&c Att which Seventeenth day of June came the said parties by their
Attorneys aforesaid And the Jurors impannelled being called like
wise came to witt Tho: Stagg, Henry Phippes, Edmond Dennis
Richard Keene, Robert Ellys, Edward Turner, Tho: Smith, Hen:
Parker Edward Cooke, John Dickson Wm Guither & John Baker who
being Elected tryed & sworne to say the truth in the prmisses upon
their Oaths doe say Wee finde for the Defendt Therefore itt is con
sidered by the Court here that the said James recover agt the said
Henry Stocket & James Stavely the sume of twelve hundred forty
foure pds of tobacco for his costs & charges by him about his defence
in this behalfe laid out & expended And the said plaintiffes in mercy
for their false claime
Henry Stocket & Charles James late of Cecil County gentl was At
James Stavely tached to answer unto Henry Stocket & James
Admrs Styles Stavely Admrs of the Goods & Chattells of Na
agt thaniel Styles in a plea of trespas on the case
Charles James And whereupon the said Henry & James by
George Parker their Attorney complaine, that
whereas the said Nathaniel Styles the fifth day of July in the yeare
of our Lord God One thousand six hundred seventy & five att the spe
ciall instance & request of the said Charles James had sold & delivered
|
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 67, Page 366 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.