Volume 67, Page 366 View pdf image (33K) |
366 Provincial Court Proceedings, 1677/8. Liber N N Whereupon they the said Henry & James say that they are the worse & have damage to the Value of foure thousand pds of tobacco & thereupon they bring their suite And the said Charles James by Christopher Rousby his Attorney cometh & defendeth the force & injury when &c and prayeth liberty to imparle hereunto untill next Provinciall Court & itt is granted unto him, the same day is given to the plaintiffes also Now here att this day to witt the Seventeenth day of June in the third yeare of the Dominion of Charles Lord Baltemore &c Annoq Dni 1678 came the said parties by their Attorneys aforesaid And the said Charles James by his said Attorney saith, that they the said Henry & James their accon aforesaid agt him the said Charles ought not to have, because he saith, that he the said Charles is not guilty of the trespas aforesaid in manner & forme as the said plaintiffes in their Declaracon have imposed upon him, & of this he putteth him self upon the Countrey. And the said Henry Stocket & James Stavely by George Parker their Attorney say, by any thing before alleadged p. 397 ought not to be debarred from Haveing their action aforesaid, be cause they say that the said Charles James is guilty of the trespas aforesaid in manner & forme as they the said Henry & James in their said Declaracon have declared, & this they pray may be inquired into by the Countrey, & the Defendt also. Therefore comand is given to the Sheriffe of St Maryes County that he cause to come here twelve &c by whom &c who neither &c to recognize &c because aswell &c Att which Seventeenth day of June came the said parties by their Attorneys aforesaid And the Jurors impannelled being called like wise came to witt Tho: Stagg, Henry Phippes, Edmond Dennis Richard Keene, Robert Ellys, Edward Turner, Tho: Smith, Hen: Parker Edward Cooke, John Dickson Wm Guither & John Baker who being Elected tryed & sworne to say the truth in the prmisses upon their Oaths doe say Wee finde for the Defendt Therefore itt is con sidered by the Court here that the said James recover agt the said Henry Stocket & James Stavely the sume of twelve hundred forty foure pds of tobacco for his costs & charges by him about his defence in this behalfe laid out & expended And the said plaintiffes in mercy for their false claime Henry Stocket & Charles James late of Cecil County gentl was At James Stavely tached to answer unto Henry Stocket & James Admrs Styles Stavely Admrs of the Goods & Chattells of Na agt thaniel Styles in a plea of trespas on the case Charles James And whereupon the said Henry & James by George Parker their Attorney complaine, that whereas the said Nathaniel Styles the fifth day of July in the yeare of our Lord God One thousand six hundred seventy & five att the spe ciall instance & request of the said Charles James had sold & delivered |
||||
Volume 67, Page 366 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.