| Volume 67, Page 356 View pdf image (33K) |
356 Provincial Court Proceedings, 1677/8.
Liber N N Tho: Waghob
agt
Jacobus Loton
Geo: Tite
Clement Hill These five actions are agreed
Tho: Jones
agt
Wm ffurnes
Moyes Exrs
agt
Margery Stone
Exx Matt: Stone
p. 588 To the Honble Thomas Notley Esqr Governor & chiefe
Justice of Maryland & to the rest of his Lopps Justices
of the Provinciall Court
James Moadesly The Answer of Wm Stevens, John Brooke,
agt Henry Tripp, Stephen Gary, Bartholomew
the Comrs of Dorchister Ennalls & Henry Bradley genti his Lopps
CountyJustices of peace for his County of Dor
chister within this Province, to the peticoń
of James Moadesly of Dorchister County planter exhibitted by the
said Moadesly agt these respondents before yor Honors & upon which
yot Honrs were pleased to order the respondents to appeare & answer
the prmisses
These respondents say, that the said Moadesly was by the County
Court of Dorchister County appointed Overseer of the high wayes of
Armitage Hundred the said three yeares as by his peticoń he hath sett
forth but that the same was done att the request & by the speciall
desire of the said Moadesly, itt being (as he pretended) for his owne
conveniency to see the high wayes of the said Hundred well & suffi
ciently repayred
These respondents further say, that the said Moadesly was prsented
by John Alford to the grand jury of the said County of Dorchister
att a Court there holden the seventh day of Novembr one thousand
six hundred seventy seven for neglect of his Office of Overseer of the
highwayes, & by the said Grand Jury was found fineable two thou
sand pds of tobacco for the same And thereupon afterwards the tenth
of Novembr following, the Court haveing first ordered the Clerke to
issue forth Sumons for the said Moadesly to shew cause (if any he
had) why he should not be fined according to the said Act of As
sembly upon the said prsentment, & the said Court being then fully
informed of his the said Moadeslys due service with the said Sumons,
they were of opinion that the said Moadesly ought to pay the said
ffine according to Act of Assembly in that case provided
|
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 67, Page 356 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.