| Volume 67, Page 353 View pdf image (33K) |
Provincial Court Proceedings, 1677/8. 353
the Court hath ordered that the said debt be paid out of the Estate Libcr N N
of the said Tho: Howell with costs of suite ats ExecucOn. Whereas
itt doth not appeare how the said debt was proved, or whether the
said account was duely sworne to, to which the said Exrs ought to
have bin sumoned to answer & defend themselves, being otherwise
debarred of putting in their just plea of plené administravit or the
Statute of lymitacons in barre of the said account being most of itt
of above two yeares standing att the comencemt of the said pre
tended suite, & ought not to be admitted agt a dead mans Estate, or
such other legall plea as they should have bin advised, but the Exrs
are condemned unheard which is altogether illegall & erronious &
expressly agt the twenty eighth Chapter of the Statute of Magna
Charta, in that case made & provided.
Also itt is further erronious in this, that in the accompt by him
exhibitted on which itt is supposed the order of Court was grounded
it is said
Capt Tho: Howell is Dr 115 tob
To Mr Job Walton att request 950
To Mr Wm Dunkerton at request 550
And itt doth not appeare how the same was proved, or by whom
the request was made, nor any receipt or order produced, which
ough to be done & sufficiently made appeare, especially in the case of
an Adr or Exr who are but trustees for Creditors & Legatees, & if itt
were only proved by his owne oath is not sufficient, but the order &
receipt must be duely proved by testimony—And for the same reasons
itt is erronious in the next Sum of ffifteen hundred forty two pds of
tobacco said to be paid to Capt Thomas Carleton for the use & att
the request of Capt Howell ffurther the acct sayes. To a dozen of
pills to Nathl Howell 30lb tob
For Capt Tho: Howell a pectorall julipp 6o
To ditto a voyage attendance wth boat & hands 140
The said George Wells ought not to be his owne carver, but ought
to have brought his quantum meruit for the same, or proved a posi
tive assumpsit for the same.
Lastly the said George Wells by the creditt side setts the prices
of what was sold him, & yet the Court gives judgemt ats Execucon,
which order is illegall & not warranted by Law And thereupon the
said John and Nathaniel Howell say, that in the Record & proces as
in the giveing of Judgemt aforesaid itt is manifestly erronious in the
Errors aforesaid by them in forme aforesaid alleadged, & pray that
the judgemt aforesaid be revoaked & adnulled & held for nought And
that they in those things wch they by occasion of the prmisses have
lost may be restored And that the said George Wells to the Errors
aforesaid may answer. Which Record proces & Errors aforesaid
being read & heard the said George Wells by George Parker his At
torney prayeth lycense to imparle thereupon untill next Provinciall
|
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 67, Page 353 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.