Volume 67, Page 167 View pdf image (33K) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Provincial Court Proceedings, 1677/8. 167 Rumsey did binde himself e his heyres Exrs Admrs Yet notwithstand- Liber N N ing the said James Rumsey the said sume of foure thousand two hundred & sixteen pounds of tobacco according to the tenour of the said bill hath not paid, but the same to pay altogether denyes, where upon the said Stephen Luffe saith he is damnified & hath losse to the Value of Eight thousand pounds of tobacco, & thereupon he bringeth his suite. And the said James Rumsey by Kenelm Cheseldyn his Attorney cometh & defendeth the force & injury when &c and prayeth liberty of speakeing hereunto untill next Court & itt is granted him, the same day is giuen to the said Stephen Luffe Now here att this day to witt the one & twentieth day of ffebry in the third yeare of the dominion of Charles Lord Baltemore &c An noq Doni 1677 came the said Stephen Luffe by his Attorney afore. said, & & offered himselfe against the said James in the plea afore said And the said James by his said Attorney came also & saith, that as to two thousand one hundred fifty six pounds of tobacco he cannot gainsay, for that he oweth the same to the said Stephen And is content that judgemt passe against him for the same where upon itt is granted by the Court here, that the said Stephon Luffe recover against the said James Rumsey the sume of two thousand one hundred fifty six pounds of tobacco debt As also the sume of Seaven hundred pounds of tobacco costs of suite ffebruary 13th 1677. Upon the peticOn of James Moseley of Dorchister County, that on the sixth day of October One thousand six hundred seventy foure. oure, haveing before lately served as Overseer for the highwayes for Armitage Hundred in the said County, was againe ordered by the Comissionrs there to be againe Overseer for the sume Hundred which he performed, & in the yeare One thousand six hundred seventy five was served with an order from the said Comrs to serve in the said Office, which he could not performe, by reason he was not impowered by the said order or warrant to presse Assistance for the performance of the worke Yett neverthelesse att a Court held in the County afore said the seventh of Novembr last past was presented to the grand Jury there for not makeing the high wayes passable according to Act of Assembly, & fined by the Court two thousand pounds of tobacco And for that he was ordered to serve as aforesaid as Over seer oftener then is usuall & contrary to Act of Assembly, & not enabled by the warrant to presse Assistance, & the warrant not made within the tyme lymitted by the Act, & condemned unheard And the matter never putt to a petty jury, & the grand jury consisting but of Eleven men Itt is ordered by the Court here, that the Judgmt aforesaid be superseded And that the Justices who were then prsent in Court att the passing the Judgemt aforesaid be Sumoned to ap peare here att the next Provinciall Court to answer the prmisses |
![]() | |||
![]() | ||||
![]() |
Volume 67, Page 167 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.