| Volume 66, Page 64 View pdf image (33K) |
64 Provincial Court Proceedings, 1675.
Liber N N Afterwards to wit ths six and twentith day of the same November
it is the judgment of the Court here that for want of pleading the
deft accompt and that Mr Christopher Rousby and Mr Thomas Dent
be armed with a cothission to examine wittnesses upon Oath and to
state & audite the accompts betweene the said parties upon the tenth
day of January next & report thereof make here the next Provinciall
Court.
Att which Said next Provinciall Court to witt the ninth day of
ffebruary in the yeare aforesaid the said Christopher Rousby and
Thomas Dent made no report thereupon But the aforesaid Christo-
pher Rousby and Gerard Slye Gent being by ordr of this Court armed
with a Cömission to examine wittnesses upon Oath and to state &
audite the accompts betweene the said parties and to make report
here to witt at st Johns the twelfth day of ffebruary in the yeare
aforesaid doe report as followeth vizt In Obedience to a writ under
the seale of this Court hereunto annexed beareing date the ninth
day of ffebruary instant impowering Us to audite the accompt be-
tweene John Quigley plaintiff and Ralph Blackhall defendant & to
state the same & returne Our report to this Honble Court the twelfth
instant Wee doe humbly certifie.
That Wee have perused and examined aswell the accompt & charge
of the said plt as also the accompts of the said deft which we have
stated & hereunto annexed and upon the whole matter We doe find
that the said Ralph Blackhall the defendt is upon the ballance of
accompts indebted unto the said John Quigley the summe of ninty
foure thousand six hundred & six pounds of tobacco.
That the said Ralph Blackhall hath produced unto Us Sundry
bills of severall persons taken in the name of the said John Quigley
which bills we have herewith returned to your Honrs amounting in
all to fifteene thousand nine hundred thirty & One pounds of tobacco
which he the said defendant craves to have allowed out of the Said
ballance But in regard the said defendant hath not produced witnes
before Us to prove that the said bills & every or any of them are the
true & proper bills of the respective persons named therein Wee doe
therefore humbly reserve it to the judgment of this Honble Court
whether the same shall be allowed to be discompted by the said
defendant he not haveing produced to Us the accompts of the particu-
lar Sales of goods to Severall of the said persons mentioned in the
said bills alleadging that his booke is torne and defaced So as he is
not able to doe it.
But in case your honrs doe thinke fitt to allow the aforesaid bills
to be discompted Out of the aforesaid ballance then the remainder
doe to the Said Quigley will be Seventy Eight thousand six hundred
Seventy five pounds of tobacco
All which Wee humbly Submitt to judgment.
Chr: Rousby
Gerard Slye.
|
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 66, Page 64 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.