| Volume 66, Page 210 View pdf image (33K) |
210 Provincial Court Proceedings, 1676.
Liber N N aforesaid to him in forme aforesaid imposed was not guilty, nor
P. 134 for that Occasion he ever withdrew himselfe Upon which it was
considered by the Court aforesaid that the aforesaid John Wedge
Should goe from thence quietly As by the aforesaid judgmt and
processe then before the Said Justices remaineing fully appeares of
Record By which pretext of which premisses the said John Wedge
not Only in his Goods name same creditt and estimation aforesaid
in which before he was reputed was greatly hurt and dampnified and
in his body so unquiet appeared but also great store and summes
or quantityes of tobacco and mony for purging exonerating and in
delivering in defence of his Innocency in that part to Spend & dis-
burse was constreyned and compelled to the losse of the said John
Wedge One hundred thousand pounds of tobacco, And thereupon
he bringeth his Suite
And the said James Ringold by Peter Sayer his Attorny cometh
and defendeth the force and injury when &c and prayeth liberty of
Speakeing hereunto untill next Provinciall Court and it is granted
him the same day is given to both parties.
Now here at this day to witt the eleventh day of April in the
first yeare of the Dominion of Charles Lord Baltemore &c Annoq
Dom One thousand six hundred Seventy Six came the said John
Wedge and James Ringold by their Attornyes aforesaid & the Said
James Saith that he is in nothing guilty of the prmisses in manner
& forme as the Said John Wedge in his declaration aforesaid hath
declared against him & of this he putts himselfe upon the Country
and the plaintiff also. Whereupon Comãnd is given to the Sheriff
of st Maries County that he cause to come here twelve &c who
neither &c to recognize &c because aswell &c Att which said eleventh
day of April in the yeare aforesaid came aswell the said John Wedge
and the said James Ringold by their Attorneys aforesaid as the jurors
of that jury likewise came to witt Wm Abestone John Alexander
James Thompson John Askin Thomas Stonestreet Henry Rider
Richard Ridgell Richard Attwood Thomas Potter Wm Harris
Richard Chilman and Wm Newport who being impannelled Sum-
moned and Sworne to say the truth in the premisses and haveing
heard what could be Said on either part Upon their Oathes doe Say.
Wee of the jury doe find cause of action for the plaintiff and allow
him for damages eleaven thousand pounds of tobacco with costs
of Suite. Which verdict of the jurors aforesaid being read & heard
the Said James Ringold by his said Attorny moved the Court here
in Arrest of judgmt and prayed day untill the next Provinciall Court
and it is granted him the same day is given to both parties.
John Ingram Giles Blizard late of Calvert County otherwise called
agt Giles Blizard of Great Choptanck River in Talbott
Giles Blizard County Carpenter was Summoned to answer unto
John Ingram of a plea that he render unto him three
|
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 66, Page 210 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.