Volume 65, Page 315 View pdf image (33K) |
Provincial Court Proceedings, 1674. 315 Thomas Mountford Liber M M agt in Ejectment. Samuel Hatton Samuel Hatton late of Talbott County was attached to answer unto Thomas Mountf[ord] of a plea wherefore by force and armes a parcell of land called Gouldstone contein[ing] fifty acres in Great Choptanck in Talbott County which Edward Roe to him the said Thomas did demise for a terme which is not yet past did enter and him the Said Thomas did eject from his ifarme aforesaid and other Enormityes to him did there doe to the great damage of the Said Thomas and Contrary to the Peace &c And whereupon the Said Thomas by John Morecroft his Attorny p. 235 Complaineth that whereas the Said Samuel the tenth day of May in the 40th yeare of the Dominion of Caecilius &c had demised to him the said Thomas the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenfices to have and to hold to the said Thomas and his assignes from the feast of the Annunciation of the blessed Virgin Mary to the end and terme of five yeares from thence next ensueing fully to be com pleate and ended by Virtue of which demise the said Thomas into the Tenemts aforesaid with the appurtenfics aforesaid did enter and was thereof possessed and So thereof being possessed the Said Samuel Hatton the Said Sixth day of July in the 40th yeare of the Dominion of Caecilius aforesaid into the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenfics which the said Edward to the Said Thomas in forme aforesaid had demised for the terme aforesaid which is not yet past with force and armes did enter and him the Said Thomas from his farme aforesaid did eject and other enormityes to him did there doe to the great damage of him the Said Thomas and contrary to the peace &c whereupon he Saith he is dampnified and is worse to the value of tenn pounds Sterling and thereupon he bringeth his Suite. And the Said Samuel Hatton by Kenelm Cheseldyn his Attorny Comes and defends the force and injury when &c and the Said Samuel prayeth delay thereof untill the first day of December Court and the Same day is granted unto the Said Thomas. And the Said John Boone by Thomas Bland his Attorny comes and defends the force and injury when &c and Saith he is in no wise guilty of the trespas and ejectment as the Said Thomas there hath declared and of this he putts himself e upon the judgmt of the Court. Now here at his day to witt the fourtenth day of October in the 43th yeare of his Lopps Dominion &c Came the said John Boone the deft in this cause by Thomas Bland his Attorny but the said Edward Roe the ejector came not Therefore it is considered by the Court that a non suite be granted against the plaintiff and that the Said John Boone recover against the Said Edward Roe the Sume of Seaven hundred forty foure pounds of tobacco for his costs and |
||||
Volume 65, Page 315 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.