Volume 65, Page 210 View pdf image (33K) |
210 Provincial Court Proceedings, 1673/4. Liber M M in the County of New Yorke did in psuance of a Certeine Contract and Charterpty made betweene them the sd John Litchington Mar- rifler Master & Pt owner of the good ship Called the Mary of London of the one pty and the sd John Maltby by the name of John Maltby of New haven in New England Marchant on the other pty had given & Delivered unto the sd John Litchington his bill of Exchange ac cording to the use of Marchants to one John Nethway Marchant in ffiall Directed, and by the same his bill of Exchange had apointed and authorised him the sd John Nethway to pay unto him the sd John Litchington the sume of One hundred & Twenty pounds sterling p. 147 at ten dayes sight of the said bill of Exchange, the said John Maitby did then & there assume upon himself, and in Consideracon thereof to the said John Litchington did faithfully pmise that if the sd John Nethway should not Content satisfy & pay unto the sd John Litchington the sd sume of 120l stert at Tenn dayes sight according to the Tenor & Effect of the said bill of Exchange that he ye sd John Maltby the sd suffie of 120l stert to him the sd John Litchington when thereunto Required would well & truly Content & pay, and the said John Litchington in fact saith that he the said John Litch ington did shew the 27th day of January 1671 the sd bill of Exchange of 120 Stert unto the sd John Nethway & Required him the sd John Nethway to pay the sd sume of 120l stert according to the Tenor of the said bill of Exchange wch sd bill of Exchange the sd John Neth way wholy Refused and Denyed to accept & pay whereby action hath accrued to the sd John Litchington to Require & have of the sd John Maitby the sd 120l Stert, Notwthstanding ch the sd John Maltby his sd pmise & assumption as aforesd made little reguarding but Devising and fraudulently intending him the sd Litchington the sd 120l sterling to Defraud and Deceive the sd 120l stert though often Required to him the sd John Litchington according to his promise hath not payd but the same altogether Denyes And the said John Maitby by Vincent Lowe his Attorney Cometh & Defendeth the wrong & Injury when &c and saith that he did not assume & pmise in manner & forme as the sd John Litchington hath above Declared agt him & of this he puts himself upon the Country and the sd John Litchington likewise. Therefore Comaund is given to the Sheriff of St Maryes County that he Cause to Come before the Justices of the next Provincial Court to be held at the Citty of St Maryes the 11th day of ffebruary next being the first day of the same Court; Twelve &c by whom &c who neither &c because aswell &c to Recognize &c & the same day is given to both ptyes. At wch day that is to say the 11th day of ffebruary in the 41th yeare of the Dominion of Caecilius &c Annocp Domini 1672 Came aswell the sd John Litchington by Kenelm Chiseldyne his Attorney as the sd John Maltby by Vincent Lowe his Attorney & the Jurors of that |
||||
Volume 65, Page 210 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.