| Volume 65, Page 140 View pdf image (33K) |
140 Provincial Court Proceedings, 1673.
Liber M M Richard Hallet
agt These foure Causes for Special Reasons the
Nicholas Wyat .
Cort thereunto moving are continued untill the
The same .
next Provincial Cort.
agt
The same
Virlinda Stone
agt
Edmond Lindsey
Tho: Kendall George Munrow late of Calvert County otherwise
agt called George Munrow of St Maryes County Min-
George Munrow ister was suthoned to answere unto Thomas Ken
dall in a plea that he Render unto him foure
Thowsand and fifty pounds of Tobacco wch to him
he oweth and unjustly Deteineth &c
And whereupon the said Thomas by Robert Carvile his Attorney
saith that whereas the said George upon the one and Twentieth day
of August in the 40th yeare of the Dominion of Caecilius &c Annoq
Domini 1671 by his certeine writing obligatory web ye said Thomas
with the seale of the aforesayd George signed here brings into Cort
whose date is the day and yeare abovesaid did acknowledge himself
to owe and stand indebted to the said Thomas the said sume of foure
Thowsand and fifty pounds of Tobacco and Casque to be payd to
the said Thomas at some Convenient place in Talbot County at or
upon the Tenth day of October next Ensueing the date of the said
writing obligatory yet the said George though often Demanded the
said sume of foure Thowsand and fifty pounds of Tobacco hath not
Rendered or payd but the same to Render and pay as yet doth Deny
and unjustly Deteynes, whereupon the said Thomas saith he is
Damnifyed and hath losse to the vallue of five Thowsand pounds
of Tobacco, and thereupon he bringeth his suite
And the said George by Kenelm Chiseldine his Attorney comes
and Defends the force and injury when &c and saith that the said
Thomas his accoñ aforesayd ought not to have because he saith that
he the said George the bill aforesayd to the said Thomas did make
and seale through the hardnes of Imprisonmt, and this he is Ready
to verrify whereupon he prayeth Judgemt whether the said Thomas
ought to have his accoñ aforesayd against him.
And the aforesayd Thomas saith that he by any thing before
alledged ought not to be Debarred from having his accoñ aforesayd
because he saith that the aforesayd George at the time of the making
of the said bill was of his owne Right at large and the same bill of
his owne meere and volluntary will to the same Thomas did make
and seale and not through the hardnes of Imprisonmt as the afore
sayd George hath above alledged and this he prayes may be Enquired
|
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 65, Page 140 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.