| Volume 57, Page 422 View pdf image (33K) |
422 Provincial Court Proceedings, 1668—69.
Liber FF Wee haue Audited all papers Concerning the Premesses & finde that
the said Richard Attkins stands endebted to the said Richard Bayley
the full quantity of Six hundred ninety eighte pounds of tobaccoe
John Blomfeild
Tho: Carleton
Ordred it be soe Entred for Judgment
[p. 766] Benjamin Rozer plaintiffe Rozer p p
George Thompson defendantf Caluert p deft
The plt sues the defendt in a plea that hee render him Eleauen
Thousand Two hundred pounds of tobaccoe by Obligacon upon Bond
for the paymt of Fiue Thowsand Six hundred pounds of tobaccoe
The defendt alleadgeth that according to Act of Assembly bee had
not a Copy of the declaracon deliuered him att the time hee was
arrested wherefore bee Craues a nonsuite
The plt denys that hee was Obleiged to deliuer the Copy to the
defendt, he being taker by a writt of Priuiledge which is a liberty
allowed to the Attornys of this Court, which was alsoe the Opinion
of the Court therein
The defendt by his Attorny William Caluert doth Confess Judg-
ment to the plt for the abouesaid principle being Fiue Thowsand Six
hundred pounds of tobaccoe
Richard Tilghman plaintiffe Morecroft p quer.
Jacob Brimington defendt Nottley p defendt
The plt sues the defendant in a plea that hee render him Two and
Twenty Thowsand pounds of tobaccoe being the Obligacon of a
Bond for the paymt of Tenn Thowsand eighte hundred and ninety
pounds of tobaccoe
Att the request of both partyes who being present in Cort that
Auditors may be by the Court appointed for the uiewing settling and
Auditeing all Accompts depending between the plt and defendt as
a!soe all Agreemts Contracts Obligacons and Bonds whatsoeuer that
is made or past between them and now in dispute or question from
the beginning of the world
The aduice of the Court is that they would nominate each person
an Auditor and a third prson for umpire in Case they should not
agree, whereupon they nominated and agreed upon Philemon Loyd
Wm Coursey and Joseph wicks gent, the Court likewise further ad-
uised them to choose each party a Carpenter for the uiewing all build-
ings made by the deft for the plt and to giue a report of the same to
the sd Auditors who are to deliuer theire report of the whole unto
the Justices of the next Court
The Opinion of the Court is likewise that the defendt Ought to
finish and perfect such peces of buildings as hee hath or had taken
in hand to build of the plaintiffs
|
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 57, Page 422 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.