| Volume 57, Page 413 View pdf image (33K) |
Provincial Court Proceedings, 1668—69. 413
It is therefore againe Ordred that the defendt haue time till next Liber FF
Prouinciall Court to exhibite a perfect intire and methodicall Accompt
of the Estate of the said Robert Brook decd and to produce then to
the Court Copyes of all Orders and Judgmts past agt the said Estate
in any County Court wthin the prouince and all other paperthe Clearing and discharging her selfe of the same Verte
Further Ordred that the plaintiff haue deliuered to hime what [p. 757]
bills Bonds or other thing materiall that is taken by Execucon and
leauyed by the sherriffe of Caluert County towards the sattisfying
and discharging of the debt due to the plt out of the Estate of the
said Robert Brooks
Daniel Jenifer plaintiffe The plt hauing Attachmt last Court granted
Anthony Callaway deft him agt the Estate of the defendt for Six-
teen hundred pounds of tobacco, the sherriff of Talbott County re-
turnes the same as followeth
I hauing attached in the hands of Jonathan Hopkinson the Estate
of Anto Callaway the said Hopkinson confessing that hee stands
endebted unto the said Callaway fifteene hundred pounds of tobaccoe
Will: Coursey
Wherupon Judgmt is granted the plt for the said Sume of fifteen
hundred pounds of tobaccoe in the hands of the said Jonathan
Hopkinson
Daniel Jenifer plaintiff The plaintiff hauing Attachmt last Court
Anthony Callaway deft granted him also against the Estate of the
defendt for another sume of Sixteen hundred pounds of tobaccoe,
which writt of Attachmt being not executed Ordred that the same be
Continued to the plt:
Toby Wells plaintiffe Jenifer p quer.
Jno Vicaris defendt Morecroft def:
noe returne being made from the Commrs of Kent County according
to an order here past last Court,
Ordred it be resplted to the last day of this Court
The Court is adjourn'd till tommorrow morning
The Justices all mett as yesterday this being the 10th of Febb: 1668
George Monroe Complainant Morecroft p quer.
Henry Hyde Nico Bead and Caluert p defendt
Eliz: his wife defendants
The defendt hauing not fully Answered to the bill Exhibited agt
him by the Complaint, It is therefore Ordred that the defendt doe
put in a full and perfect Answere to the said Bill on the first day of
the next Court as hee is required in the Replicacon put in by the
Complainant
|
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 57, Page 413 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.