| Volume 57, Page 304 View pdf image (33K) |
304 Provincial Court Proceedings, 1668.
Liber FF Jno Anderton et ux
Upon an Assize
ag Jno Woollcott
At the last provinciall Court time was then granted the deft untill
this Court to prove Greshams title good to the land in question Now
Ordered this Cause be resplted untill next Court.
Raymond Stappelfort agt Morecroft p quer
Eliz: Brooke admrx Robt Brooke Jenifer p delt
This cause resplted till this Court The deft was now required by
the Court to putt in what further demands she can make in discount
of the twenty thousand pounds of tobacco due from her deceased
husband to John Bayly late of this province, that the plaintiff may
haue judgmt for the remainder according to an Order past last pro-
vinciall Court
Upon examineing all papers and accompts relateing to the defts
demands Out of the said debt of which there remained due to the
said John Bayly six thousand nine hundred eighty seaven pounds of
tobacco, for which said Summe judgment was granted the plain-
tiff against the estate of the said Robert Brooke deceased.
Jno Avery agt -
Morecroft p quer
Eliz: Brooke admrx Rob Brooke
This Cause resplted till this Court the plaintiff declared upon a
bond for thirty foure thousand nine hundred thirty foure pounds
of tob, of which there is proved satisfied eighteen thousand One
hundred Sixty nine pounds.
Ordered that the plaintiff haue judgment for the remainder being
sixteen thousand seaven hundred seaventy five pounds of tob, to be
allowed Out of the assetts that shall remaine due upon the accompt
of the estate of the said Robert Brookes after the examination
thereof.
George Yate plaintiff agt The deft as Attorny aforesaid formerly
Edward Loyd Esq the Att entred Caveat in the Secretaryes Office
of Richard Owen deft with request that no Pattent might is-
sue or be granted to the plaintiff for a parcell of land Containeing
five and twenty acres lyeing in Ann Arrundell County untill his
Claimes thereunto On the behalfe of the said Owen were heard and
determined Wherefore the deft was Suthoned to this Court to shew
cause (if any he had) why Pattent should not issue to the plaintiff
for the said parcell of land, Who alleadged that the plaintiff Ought
not to haue a grant for the same being formerly surveyed and sett
forth to the said Owen fifteen or sixteen yeares since and rent paid
for the same being demanded why he did not take Out pattent in the
name of Richard Owen for the said land, replyed he did repaire to
the Secretaryes Office accordingly as he was required by the last
|
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 57, Page 304 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.