Volume 57, Page 201 View pdf image (33K) |
Provincial Court Proceedings, 1667. 201 John Tretrise plaintiffe The plt: Obtain'd Attachmt agt the Estate Liber FF Jno pltt defendant of the defendt who now appeares there- Dan: Jenifer p quer unto—Ordered that the deft finde Security Jno Morecroft p deft to answere the suite next Prouinall Cott, and that the Attachmt be let fall'n and the Goods by uertue thereof re- deliuered (soe attached) to the defendt Wm Gard Peter Bully Henry The plts obtain'd Attachmt agt the Es- [P. 493] Denning Wm Denning and tate of the defendt who now appeares Henry Ellis plaintiffs to answere the same—Ordered that John pltt defendant the defendt finde security to answere Jenifer p quer the suite next Prouinciall Court, And that the Attachmt bee wthdrawne Wm Gard by Daniel Jenifer his Attorney Craueth Judgmt agt the Goods of Edward Hunt aliready Attached by Order of this Court the uallue thereof being return'd by the sherriffe of Caluert County amounting unto the sume of seauen Thowsand Nine hundred pounds of tobaccoe John pltts makes appearance on behalfe of the said Edward Hunt, to whome the Goods was tendred, Prouided hee would sattisfye the said Gard his and the seamens wages which doth amount unto £48: 15: 4 ster: which the sd pltts refused to take, Therefore Ordered that the said Wm Gards Attorney haue Execucon for the said Goods, which doth not fully sattisfye the said sume of £48: 15 : 4 wth Charges thereon there fore Ordered that the said Gard haue At- tachmt for the remaindr in any place upon the Estate of the sd Hunt wthin this Prouince Miles Hugall plt The plt sues the defendt uppon an accompt, which John Noble deft the defendt puts to a Jury as alsoe upon a bill undr Jenifer p quer ithe defendts hand, which said Accompt and bill Caluert p defendtf amounts unto the sume of £4691 lb tob: Jury im- pannell'd whose names are as followeth (uizt) Foreman Wm Euans Charles Boteler • . • being all Called Ambroze Biggs William Osbeston • . . by theire names Tho: Sterling Demetrius Cartwright m . and sworne went W Barnett Patrick Allen forth to consider John Russell William Chaplin tflereon W Kent Samuell Graues The Jury returning into Court (hauing first an Order for theire Charges) and deliuers in theire uerdict (uizt) on the back side of the Accompt is thus endorced Thc opinion of the Jury is that there is noething due upon this accompt, and on the back side of the bill thus Non est factum |
||||
Volume 57, Page 201 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.