| Volume 57, Page 201 View pdf image (33K) |
Provincial Court Proceedings, 1667. 201
John Tretrise plaintiffe The plt: Obtain'd Attachmt agt the Estate Liber FF
Jno pltt defendant of the defendt who now appeares there-
Dan: Jenifer p quer unto—Ordered that the deft finde Security
Jno Morecroft p deft to answere the suite next Prouinall Cott, and
that the Attachmt be let fall'n and the Goods by uertue thereof re-
deliuered (soe attached) to the defendt
Wm Gard Peter Bully Henry The plts obtain'd Attachmt agt the Es- [P. 493]
Denning Wm Denning and tate of the defendt who now appeares
Henry Ellis plaintiffs to answere the same—Ordered that
John pltt defendant the defendt finde security to answere
Jenifer p quer the suite next Prouinciall Court, And
that the Attachmt bee wthdrawne
Wm Gard by Daniel Jenifer his Attorney Craueth Judgmt agt the
Goods of Edward Hunt aliready Attached by Order of this Court the
uallue thereof being return'd by the sherriffe of Caluert County
amounting unto the sume of seauen Thowsand Nine hundred pounds
of tobaccoe
John pltts makes appearance on behalfe of the said Edward Hunt,
to whome the Goods was tendred, Prouided hee would sattisfye the
said Gard his and the seamens wages which doth amount unto
£48: 15: 4 ster: which the sd pltts refused to take, Therefore
Ordered that the said Wm Gards Attorney haue Execucon for the
said Goods, which doth not fully sattisfye the said sume of £48: 15 : 4
wth Charges thereon there fore Ordered that the said Gard haue At-
tachmt for the remaindr in any place upon the Estate of the sd Hunt
wthin this Prouince
Miles Hugall plt The plt sues the defendt uppon an accompt, which
John Noble deft the defendt puts to a Jury as alsoe upon a bill undr
Jenifer p quer ithe defendts hand, which said Accompt and bill
Caluert p defendtf amounts unto the sume of £4691 lb tob: Jury im-
pannell'd whose names are as followeth (uizt)
Foreman Wm Euans Charles Boteler
• . • being all Called
Ambroze Biggs William Osbeston
• . . by theire names
Tho: Sterling Demetrius Cartwright
m . and sworne went
W Barnett Patrick Allen
forth to consider
John Russell William Chaplin
tflereon
W Kent Samuell Graues
The Jury returning into Court (hauing first an Order for theire
Charges) and deliuers in theire uerdict (uizt) on the back side of the
Accompt is thus endorced
Thc opinion of the Jury is that there is noething due upon this
accompt, and on the back side of the bill thus Non est factum
|
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 57, Page 201 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.