clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Acts of the General Assembly, 1757-1758
Volume 55, Page 771   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

Appendix. 771


OPINION


Upon the whole Your Opinion is Desired upon Consideration of
the Maryland Act together with M.r Stuarts Memorial and the
Observations Arising upon it
1.st Qu[aere]. Whether this Act of Assembly be in any Respect
Repugnant to the Laws of England or an Improper Exertion of
the Legislative Powers of this Province so far as it Respects the
Matter of M.r Stuarts Complaint.
This Question is very extensive and difficult to be Answered
as it seems to refer to all the Laws of Great Britain Relative to
the Colonies, but as far as those Laws are particularised with the
Case, I do not see that the Act of Assembly is repugnant to them or
any improper Exertion of the Legislative Power in Maryland.
2.d Qu[aere]. Supposing there be any foundation for that Com-
plaint Can it now be Advisable for Lord Baltimore to Repeal or
vary the Law (after so long an Acquiescence) as Required by M.r
Stuart and what will be the Consequences of such Repeal or Variation
and what Answer will it be proper for His Lordship to return to
the Memorial. And Is there any pretence for Requiring his Lord-
ship to Refund Personally any money which may have been Levied
upon M.r Stuart by Virtue of this Act (Supposing the Act to have
been over so injurious or illegal).

I think it would not be proper for Lord Baltimore to vary the
Law after so long an Acquiescence especially as the Gov.t
hath not remonstrated against It, as a Repeal might be
Attended with great Confusion in the Province. Nor do I
see why Lord Baltimore sh.d Personally refund this Money.
But if there are any Acts of Parliament that seem to re-
strain the Legislature of Maryland from Affecting with a
Duty any Imports from Great Britain it may be prudent
for Lord Baltimore to Stop this Precedent least it sh.d
occasion the Parliam.t to impose further Restraints
R: Henley
27. June 1757.
[Endorsed on back]
Attor.y General's S.r Robt. Henley Opinion on the Act of Assembly
1754 £6000 for His Majestys Service with relation to M.r Stuart's
Memorial ab.t the Duty Collect 'd on transported Convicts in Maryland
& Lord Baltimore's Answ.rs delivered By M.r Hemersley Attor/
to Mr Stuart July 14.th 1757.

MSS.
Calvert
Papers
No. 585
Md.Hist.Soc.



 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Acts of the General Assembly, 1757-1758
Volume 55, Page 771   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives