Volume 53, Preface 45 View pdf image (33K) |
Early Maryland County Courts. xlv ology of the marriage certificate of William Sharpe and Elizabeth Thomas, dated July 4, 1673, and recorded in the Talbot County Court, as well as the list of witnesses, shows that one, or both, were certainly Quakers (Arch. Md. liv, 603-604). Although there were a few Quakers in Charles and Kent counties they seem to have been more numerous in Talbot and Somerset. It is to be noted that in all the above cited entries these non-jurors and other offenders are not called by this or any other name, although from other sources it is known that they were Quakers. In a neighborhood fight reported in the Kent County record “Quaker” seems to have been used as an opprobrious epithet (Arch. Md. liv, 165). Indian affairs of moment did not come before the county courts but were heard by the Governor sitting in Council, or as Chief Judge of the Provincial Court. But not a little of interest concerning the Indians found its way into the county court records, either because it was of minor public significance, or was a pale reflection of more important events recorded elsewhere. The wars against the Indians, to which references are constantly to be found in these county records, refer to the expeditions sent by the Provincial authorities in the late fifties and the sixties to the head of the Chesapeake to assist the now friendly Susquehannocks to hold back the Five Nations with whom they were then at war. Until 1658 there were practically no settlements on the eastern shore of the Upper Chesapeake except those Ofl Kent Island. There was an Indian fort on the Susquehanna River, known as the Susquehannock Fort, erected by the Indians of that name to protect them from the depredations of the Northern tribes. At times Maryland settlers were sent to assist the friendly Susque hannocks, and thus protect the white settlements on the upper Bay. There was also a fort, or block house, on Kent Island, sometimes called the Crayford (Craford) Fort, which dated from the first settlement by Claiborne on that island. The Susquehannock Fort and Crayford are several times mentioned in these county records. But whether the old Crayford Fort was identical with the fort referred to in the Kent records used for a dwelling house by Captain Thomas Bradnox is uncertain. The Kent court record under date of September I, 1657, recites the details of a drunken brawl between a certain John Salter and Thomas Bradnox, a member of the court, and the attack upon Mrs. Bradnox by Salter at the Bradnox home. Reference is made to Salter as having been several times thrown out of “the fort “, but we are not told whether this was merely a stockaded house, or whether it was the old Kent Island Crayford Fort re modeled as a dwelling house (Arch. Md. liv, 118). Bradnox is known to have owned and sold a tract of land called the “Craford Plantation” (Arch. Md. liv, 119-120). A small force of settlers seems to have been maintained by the Province at the Susquehannock Fort, and to have been reinforced when Indian troubles became especially threatening. On the whole, however, in great part due to the Proprietary's friendly attitude towards the natives, Maryland perhaps suffered |
||||
Volume 53, Preface 45 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.