clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings of the County Court of Charles County, 1658-1666
Volume 53, Preface 39   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
                  Early Maryland County Courts.       xxxix

       Utie to the Assembly on April 3rd of that year, in the matter of alleged irregu
       larities in the election of members of the Lower House from Baltimore County,
       where John Collet, who held both offices, acted as the election official (Arch.
       Md. ii, 74-75). At this same session the Assembly also passed an act pro
       hibiting clerks and sheriffs from acting as attorneys in their own courts (Arch.
       Md. ii, 132), and in 1671 this prohibition was extended to subclerks and deputy
       clerks, as well as to deputy sheriffs (Arch. Md. ii, 322).
         The duties of the clerk were to have the custody of the record books and
       papers, to keep minutes of the court sessions, and to enter the various papers
       which were brought to be recorded. He also issued writs and warrants to the
       sheriff for service, and furnished copies of court orders. For a brief time he
       seems to have sent a transcript of the orders of his court to the Secretary of
       the Province. The form of oath to be taken by a county clerk is to be seen in
       the Kent records under date of January 1661/2 (Arch. Md. liv, 203). There
       is an instance noted in the Kent court proceedings for November 1657, when
       the clerk, Thomas Hynson, was admonished by the court for an error he had
       made in an entry (Arch. Md. liv, 90-91) ; and in October 1676 the clerk of
       the same county, Charles Bancks, was sued for issuing a writ without proper
       authority (Arch. Md. liv, 349). The clerks' fees were fixed by acts of the
       Assembly (Arch. Md. ii, 137, 294).
         An official, whose activities pervade the county court records, was the sheriff,
       or as he was occasionally called, the high sheriff. His office was later one of
       profit and power, as he represented both the provincial and county authorities.
       That in the hands of an unscrupulous person the opportunities for oppression
       and injustice, as well as for lining his own pockets, were great, is well brought
       out in the unabbreviated form of the sheriff's oath which recited the numerous
       things which he was not to do (Arch. Md. iii, 117; li, 373). He received no
       salary, his emoluments being entirely derived from fees which were fixed by
       successive acts of the Assembly. His official duties were to serve various writs
       issued by the Provincial, Chancery, or county courts, to carry out the orders
       of these courts in both civil and criminal cases, including execution upon the
       personal property and the body of the debtor in the collection of debts, the cus
       tody of prisoners, and the infliction of corporal or capital punishment, the
       impanelling of petit juries, the publication of public notices or proclamations,
       the supervision of the election of members of the Lower House of Assembly,
       the collection of the public levy, and various other duties. Occasionally he pre
       sented to the court for trial individuals accused of crime (Arch. Md. liv, 49).
         Until 1666 the offices of sheriff and coroner seem usually to have been com
       bined (Arch. Md. i, 55; iii, 6r, 329). Under the act of 1642 the sheriff was to
       be appointed by the chief Judge of the Provincial Court, who was usually the
       Governor, or by the presiding judge of the county court, from persons recom
       mended by a majority of the bench, and his term of office seems to have been
       at the pleasure of the court (Arch. Md. i, 148). After the passage of the act of
       1661, and as amended in 1662, he was to be selected by the Governor from three
       persons nominated by the county court, and his term of office was limited to
       one year (Arch. Md. i, 412, 451). During the disturbed period of the fifties
       


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings of the County Court of Charles County, 1658-1666
Volume 53, Preface 39   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives