clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings of the Court of Chancery, 1669-1679
Volume 51, Page 9   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
           Chancery Court Proceedings, 1669.      9





     which time the Subpoena was returnable was adjourned and that Liber CD
     they are now in time and prays a Coppy of the Bill
     gave the defend.t time to answer the said
     sometime this Court
      The                   Christopher Rouseby and Eliza
     his wife plantiffs. John Pearce defent.t
      M.r Moorecroft attorney for the plantiff moves the Court that the
     defendant having appeared to the plantiffs Bill the last Court hath
     not yet answered and therefore pray that an Attachment may be
     awarded against him for want of an answer. The defendant being
     present in Court say M.r Notley who is his Attorney is not yett come
     and therefore prays time till tomorrow in the afternoon to putt in his
     answer which this Court doth order accordingly or in default thereof
     that an Attachment do Issue out against him.

       The same day James Elver pl.t Ralph Williams Defend.t Two
     Causes.
       M.r Jenifer Attorney in the Causes for the plaintiff Says both
     these causes are ag.d

       The same day John Long pl.t William Baker and John Long pl.ts
     William Baker and Eliz.a Storey was defend.t
       M.r Rozer Attorney for the defendants returns into the Court
     two answers taken by Commission under the Comm.rs Seals M.r
     Morecroft for the plaintiff prays Coppys of them

       The same day Thomas Emerson plantiff Richard Preston de
     fendant.
      M.r Moorecroft attorney for the plaintiff and the defendant bpresent in Court say the same is agreed.                   (fol. 7) 7)

       The same day Thomas Lomax plantiff Alexand.r Smith defend.t
       M.r Moorcroft Attorney for the pl.t says this is agreed also.

      The same day John Halfatt plantiff Joseph Edloe defend.t
      M.r Moorecroft Attorney for the plantiff moves the Court that
     by an order of           the plantiff was to Examine
     Witnesses which he had done accordingly and therefore he prayed
     that publication may pass in his cause so as the plantiff may bring his
     cause on to hearing but M.r Attorney Generall for the defend.t prays
     that publication may be Stopped the plantiff not having yet replycd
     and that the defend.t may have time to Examine his wittnesses he
     having Henry Coursey Esq and divers other materiall Witnesses to
     Examine in his cause he not having Examined one Witness yet It is
     thereupon ordered that the defend.t shall have time till the next Court
     to Examine his wittnesses and for that purpose he may take out a
     


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings of the Court of Chancery, 1669-1679
Volume 51, Page 9   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives