| Volume 51, Page 493 View pdf image (33K) |
Chancery Court Proceedings, 1677. 493
Land unto the Comp.lt in fee Simple And Thereupon this Defend.t Liber P C
went with the other persons in the Bill named and vieued a peice of 106
Land which this Defend.t did not take nor approve of for that the
Land was not worth Two Thousand pounds of Tobacco p hundred
Acres nor would Abraham Birkhead or any other person have given
soe much for itt nor was the title thereof Cleere in the Comp.lt the
Same being vested in the Right Honnourable the Lord Proprietary
as part of the Mannor of the Ridge nor did the Comp.lt shew the
Defend.t any Speciall Warrant from his Excelencij nor did the
Defend.t knowe or ever heare of any land the Comp.lt ever had upon
the Ridge or belonging to the Ridge Mannor or of any Suite or tryall
he ever had or brought against M.r White for anij land there or
else where or whether or no the said five hundred Acres of Land
was Surveyed or the reason whij the same was not soe surveyed nor
did he or the other Defend.L to his knowledge beate him in hand by
any faire promises to debarr him of any action at Law but beleived
and hoped to prove if the Comp.lt would haue performed his said
Bargain and agreement on his part that the other Defend.t Nathaniell
was always ready and willing to have Conveyed and assured the
premises to the Comp.lt according to the said Agreement but the
Comp.lt haveing Continued the possession of the Premisses for the
terme of four yeares without paying any thing for the same to the
Defend.t and not haveing paid or Secured the Said Purchase con-
sideration or any part thereof or ever tendered any Conveyance of
the Premisses to be Executed by the other Defend.t as he beleived
and was informed by him voluntarily quitted and left the possession
of the Premisses and was not turned out by the Defend.ts or any
other by their order or privity And thereupon the other Defend.t lett
the Same to James Nuttall And the Defend.t denyed the said Land
Lyed within the mannors of Calverton or Zachayah or either of
them or that thereupon or by this Defend.ts perswasion the other
def.t refused to give the Comp.lt generall Warranty or that Generall
Warranty was to be given by the agreement aforesaid touching the
said sale or Exchange or other or further then such Warrantij as
is knitt by Lawe to every Exchange and denyed alsoe that by the
Agreement aforesaid the said Purchase Consideration was not to be
payd or Secured untill the Said Defend.t Natha.ll had Executed such
deed of bargain and Sale as the Comp.It by his said Bill did Suggest
and he Conceived the Comp.lt had noe cause to molest this Defend.t
this vexatious Suite after the end of Seven yeares to have the Said
bare paroll agreement Executed or Satisfaction for his pretended
disbursments when noe earnest or any part of the Purchase Con-
sideration paid or secured to the Defend.ts knowledge, and the said p.
other Defend.t being really damnified for want of the Said Purchase
Consideration the sum of tenn Thousand pounds of Tobacco and
|
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 51, Page 493 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.