| Volume 51, Page 290 View pdf image (33K) |
290 Chancery Court Proceedings, 1679.
Liber CD Octob.r 8.th 1679
Mandamus then issued to major William Coursey & m.r William
Bishop of Talbot Co.ty Gen that by the Oaths of twelve &c they
diligently Enquire what Lands Andreas Alena late of Talbot County
deced dyed Seized of Returnable without delay.
RC Charles &c To George Godfrey Greeting We Comand
you that Imediately upon Receipt of this our writt you pay
unto Elizabeth Beck mother & Guardian of Elizabeth Beck Mary
Beck and Margaret Beck infants or the bearer hereof the Sume of
four thousand Six hundred fifty nine pounds of Tobacco Costs
(fol. 290) adjudged them the Said Eliz.a mary & Margaret Beck by our Court
of Chancery in a Cause there depending between the Said Elizabeth
Mary and Margaret Beck Daughters & Coheires of Richard Beck
deced Infants by the S.d Elizabeth their mother and Guardian
Comp.lts and you the Said George Godfrey defend.t and hereof
you are not to faile under the pain Ensueing Wittness our Self dat
24.th October 1679.
RC Charles &c To Thomas Bland Gent Greeting Where
as by an Order made before us in our Court of Chancery the
Sixteenth day of Oct.r Instant in a Cause there depending Between
Joseph Tilly of Calvert County planter p.It and George Parker Gent
one of the Attorneys of our Said Court defend.t made upon the Ar
gueing the Demurrer put in by the defendant to the Comp.lts Bill our
Said Court upon the reading of the Said Comp.lts Bill & the defen
dants Demurrer were fully Satisfied that there was So much Scandal
ous & Criminous matter Couched and Contained in the Same Bill of
Complaint that the Same was not only not fitt to be Answered unto
p. 237 by any person whatsoev.r but also that it is not fit that any Scandalous
(lot. 290) Bill Replete with Such and So many Idle Scandalous and Criminous
allegations & Suggestions of which if the Said Comp.lt would make
discovery Should Remain amongst the Records of this Court against
any pson whatsoever Especially against the defendant who is an
attorney of this Court and who thereby is Charged with the breach
of the Oath office and Duty of Attorney and with Practices against
the Laws for Champtry & maintainance & fraudulent Conveyances,
Do therefore order that the S.d defendants Said Demurrer put into
the Said Comp.lts Bill be allowed and the Said Comp.lts Said Bill
not only Stand dismist, but that the Same be by the Register of this
Court taken from off the files and Records of this Co.rt for Ever
and our Court Considering the Laudable Rules & practice of the high
and Hon.ble Court of Chancery in England that where any Bill Ex
hibited into the Court of Chancery doth Contain in it any ma [tter]
Criminall or Scandalous against the Defendant or any other and if
and Concern the defendant he may refuse to Answer it and
the Comp.lt & his Councill whose hand is at the Bill may be punished
|
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 51, Page 290 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.