clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings of the Court of Chancery, 1669-1679
Volume 51, Page 17   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
          Chancery Court Proceedings, 1669.     7




    and Certify the Court before the first day of Aprill next this Court Liber C D
    reserving the Equity hereof to themselves

      The same day Rouseby Chr: & Uxor Pl.ts John Peirce defend.t
      The defendant not having yet answered the plantiff by M.r Moore-
    croft his attorney prays an Attachment and that the
    formerly granted may be continued till the defendant answer fully
    the sd plantiffs Bill clear this Contempt and this Court
    other order to the Contrary which is ordered accordingly

      The same day Long John Con Baker William and Elizabeth
    Storey Two Causes.
      The plantiff filed a general Replication this Court and the defendts
    by their Attorney appeared to Rejoyne
      The same day John Halfelt pl.t Joseph Edloe Defend.t was read
    the affidavit following John Hunt make the Oath that upon the 14.th
    day of July he delivered to Henry Coursey Escp a Subprna
    Seal of this Hoñble Court whereby the said Henry was in
    Chancery without delay to Justifye on the behalf
    the defendant and on the 15.th of the same month he delive
    another Subpoena to one John Barnes for the same purpose
    thereupon Carvile for the defendant moved that in regard the de
    fendant could not as yett procure them to be examined
            may be stayed till the next Court by which time the
    defendant would Endeavour to procure them to be Examined which
    this Court held reasonable and doth order the same accordingly.

      The same day Samuel Stone pl.t Walter Lane defend.t
      The defendant by Thomas Carleton his Attorney appears and
    prays further time to putt in his answer The Court thereupon gave
    him time till tomorrow morning to putt in the same

      The same day James Stracklady pI.t John Edmondson defend.t
      The defendant appears by Robert Carvile his Attorney and prays
    time till the next Court to putt in his answer which is granted
    accordingly.
      The same day John Bloomfield pl.t Luke Gardner defend.t
      The Matter upon the Scire facias upon which the defendant did
    appear and was to shew Cause why the pattent therein mentioned
    should not be vacated is by this Court order to be respited till the
    next Court.

      The same day John Robinson pl.t Benj.a Rozer defend.t
      The defendant by M.r Moorecroft his Attorney appears and prays
    time till the next Court to putt in his answer which is ordered
    accordingly.
       2
    


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings of the Court of Chancery, 1669-1679
Volume 51, Page 17   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives