clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Acts of the General Assembly, 1752-1754
Volume 50, Page 191   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

The Lower House. 191


Aggrievances in the Prosecution of Suits at Law, &c. indorsed, " By
the Upper House of Assembly, October 24, 1753. Read the second
Time, and will pass, with the following Amendments; instead of the
Words, are hereby made perpetual, and shall have Continuance for
ever, put, to continue for Three Years, and unto the End of the
next Session of Assembly, which shall happen after the Expiration
of the said three Years.
Signed per Order, J. Ross, Cl. Up. Ho."
On reading and considering the Report from the Committee of
Grievances, relating to Thomas Muir, Esq; the Question was put,
Whether Distress can be legally made for any Sum of Money, claimed
as Arrears of Rent due before the issuing the Patent, at any Time
after the Date of the said Patent, or Not? Resolved in the Negative.
Upon hearing Mr. Thomas Muir, on the Report of the Committee
of Aggrievances and Courts of Justice, on the Complaint of Roger
Hooper, Resolved, That the said Thomas Muir did illegally and
oppressively distrain upon the said Roger Hooper for a much greater
Sum of Money for Quit-Rents than was really due to the Lord Pro-
prietary, and took and received (from the said Hooper) as Receiver
aforesaid, extortionately, illegally, and oppressively, the said Sum of
Money.
It being moved that an Address be prepared to his Excellency the
Governor, to intreat him to order a Prosecution against the said
Thomas Muir, for the Extortion aforesaid; thereupon the Ques-
tion was put, Whether an Address be prepared to his Excellency,
intreating him to order a Prosecution against the said Thomas Muir,
or Not ? Resolved in the Affirmative.

L. H. J.
Liber No. 47
October 24


For the Affirmative.



Williamson,

Stoddert,

Hawkins,


Falconar,

Smallwood,

Wilkinson,


Carroll,

C. Goldsborough,

Tillotson,


Gassaway,

Travers,

Purnell,


J. Mackall,

Ridgely,

Evans,


B, Mackall,

Hyland,

Scarborough,


Reynolds,

Pearce,

Crabb,


Gantt,

Addison,

Chaplin,


Lee,

Frasier,

Magruder. 27



For the Negative.


p. 292

Bond,

Gillis,

Buchanan,


Barnes,

Henry,

Paca,


Mills,

Handy,

Earle,


Rasin,

J. Goldsborough,

W. Dulany,


Gresham,

Oldham,

Hopper,


Hall,

Tilghman,

Holiday,


Harrison,

Gray,

Selby,


Waggaman,

Govane,

D. Dulany. 24




 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Acts of the General Assembly, 1752-1754
Volume 50, Page 191   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives