clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings of the Provincial Court, 1663-1666
Volume 49, Preface 16   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
             xx



                           Letter of Transmittal.

             Alvey's bad record, seems to have been leniently disposed towards him, for
             although they brought in a verdict of guilty, they added that the cow was worth
             eleven pence and no more. It would appear that the theft of an object of as
             little value as this was not punishable by death. The jury was sent back by the
             court, however, with instructions to bring in a simple verdict of guilty, and
             Alvey was then and there sentenced to be hanged. A number of his friendg
             who were in court at once interceded for him on bended knees, and the Gover
             nor thereupon suspended sentence upon promise of his future good behavior
             (pages 166-168, 234-235, 453, 496, 538-545, 555). It is learned from another
             source that some eight years later a petition was presented to the Governor
             in behalf of Alvey by the Lower House of the Assembly, and as a result of
             this full pardon was then granted him by the Governor (Arch. Md. 11, 377).
             Another instance in which the “benefit of clergy” was craved and granted,
             was in the case of Arthur Nottool, arrested for burglary and left shackled
             in the sheriff's house. He wrenched off the shackles, stole some food, and was
             recaptured with difficulty. He was tried at the July, 1664, session of the court
             and found guilty, but upon claiming the benefit of clergy, he escaped the death
             penalty and was branded in the right hand and released (pages 232-233).
               Another case involving the terms of an indenture came before the court at
             its April, 1664, session. A servant maid had been sold by her master, Cuthbert
             Fenwick, under an extended indenture. The question at issue was the validity of
             a second indenture that would have extended her time of service. The case
             had been heard in the Calvert County Court, which had decided in favor of the
             girl. It was then heard on appeal by the Provincial Court, which confirmed the
             action of the lower court (pages 220-22 1, 237-238, 265, 380).
               At the December, 1664, session, the court inquired into the sudden death of
             an indentured servantS owned by John Grammer of Patuxent. The jury of
             inquest was unable to find evidence of whipping, but rendered a verdict that
             death was due to lack of proper food and lodging (page 351). At the same
             session John Holmewood of Anne Arundel County is called to account by the
             court for failing to have an inquest held over the body of a servant of his who
             was drowned. Testimony in the case clearly showed that the drowning was
             accidental, and after Holmewood had explained that he had reported the matter
             to the proper authorities, he was discharged (pages 314, 351, 374, 394). At
             the same court Sarah Hall, servant maid to Thomas Wynne, complained to the
             court that she had been abused by her master, that she had received several
             boxes on the ear and at least one “ kick on the breech,” and that her master had
             threatened to knock her down with a chair. The court ordered that she be
             appraised and sold to a new owner. The appraiser valued her at one thousand
             pounds of tobacco (pages 318-319).
               Perhaps the earliest mention of oystermen's warfare, which until compara
             tively recent years was of frequent occurrence on the Chesapeake and its tribu
             taries, was brought to the attention of the court at the March, 1663, session
             when Patrick Due, an overseer on the Bromall plantation in Calvert County,
             was tried for firing upon some sailors who were helping themselves to oysters
             recently gathered by one of the plantation hands. A sailor was killed, and Due
             


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings of the Provincial Court, 1663-1666
Volume 49, Preface 16   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives