342  Provincial Court Proceedings, 1664.






               Liber B B   Samuell Gouldsmyth Henry Stockett Charles James Richard Bennett
                      & Nathaniell Vtye herein he is to fayle as he will answere the Con
                      trary att his perill And then and there returne this writt, And for
                      soe doeing this shall be yor warrt. Giuen undr my hand this 24th day
                      of Decembr 1664—                Charles Caluert
                       To George Gouldsmyth High Sherriffe
                          of Baltemore County

                        Another summons the same aboue uerbatim to warne ditto
                      D'hynoyosa ut supra, directed

                      To the Sherriffe of Talbott County—
                  [p.419] Whereas I am Certainly Informed that ther is a debt due from
                      Augustin Herman to the Burgomasters of Amsterdam for goods
                      unlawfully by them imported into this Prouince Contrary to the Act
                      for encouragement of trade, These are in the name of the Rigt
                      Honble the Ld Proprietary to will & require yow to Command the sd
                      Augustin Herman to appeare att the next Prouinall Court to be held
                      Twesday the 7th of ffebruary there to sett forth uppon Oath what
                      Tobaccoes or Other Merchandizes hee hath in his handes or doth
                      know to be in other persons handes due or belonging to the said
                      Burgomasters of Amsterdam for the better Obseruacon of the Act
                      of the High Court of Parliamt for encouragemt of trade as he will
                      answere the Contrary att his perrill Giuen undr my hand this
                      day of Decembr 1664—            Charles Caluert
                      To George Gouldsmyth High Sherriffe
                       of Baltemore County—

                      Idem Mutatis Mutandis p Maior Samuell Gouldsmyth debts
                      Idem Mutatis Mutandis p Henry Stockett  d —
                      Idem Mutatis Mutandis p Charles James bill
                      Idem Mutatis Mutandis p Richard Bennett

                       To the honble Gouernor & Councell in Prouinall Court Assembled
                        The humble petn of Alexander D'hynyosa sheweth
                        That yor petr for a ualuable sume of Tobacco sold Abra: Morgan
                      One Negro to be paid upon the sd Morgans plantacon, in part of
                      which paymt yor petr receiued and marked 4 hhgds the sd Morgan
                      to marke and receiue for yor petrs use one hhgd of tobacco more,
                      which accordingly was done and the said flue hoggds left in the to
                      baccoe howse of the said Morgan after which Nathaniell Vtie Came
                      Contrary to law & equity in the said Morgans Absence and demanded
                      the said tobacco of the said Morgan his wife, being denyed Ordered
                      his men to take the said tobaccoe (ther being but two hhgds then
                      ready) a weake after the said Vtye came and receiued the remaindr
                      of the said tobacco without any Order from yor petr and Contrary to
                      the Act of this prouince in that Case prouided