Volume 49, Page 272 View pdf image (33K) |
272 Provincial Court Proceedings, 1664. Liber B B Veitch did know of it, and that to the best of my knowledge there is an yearling and a Calf e of the encrease of this Cow, And that this Cow had both eares Cropt, and did neuer take notice that it had any other marke, And further saith not— Demetrius Cartwright deposeth in Court saith that that Cow which James Veitch Claimes is of the same marke the rest of his Cattle (uizt) both eares Cropt and an half e moone cut out of the upper part of the care, and that James Veitch did make demand of this Cow, and her encrease, and Mr Tripp did deny to deliuer them, and further saith not— James Price deposeth in Court saith that this Deponant was not att home, when the Cattle of Michael Brooks were appraysed, and that James Veitch did desire me to goe into the penn to see the marke of the Cow which he Claimed and I found the marke to be Cropt on both cares and an halfe on the topp of each care and further saith not William Euans deposeth in Court saith that James Veitch made demand of a Cow and her encrease that he said was his, of Henry Tripp, and he said he would not deliuer them wthout Order of Court and further saith not— Hen: Tripp upon appeale plt : the foregoeing appeale undr the James Veitch defendant Cla rkes hand of Caluert County uide pete Court being read, which appeale was in Chancery, James Veitch the 322 cleft alleadgeth that the pit: could not appeale in Chancery by reason there was no injunction on it therefore Craues a dissmission— The Court adjournes till afternoone againe rnett the Leiutennt Generall alsoe prsent But Mr White absent by reason of his indisposedness in health [p. 339] The foregoeing pit: and deft againe at the Board appearing Both partyes Ioyne issue, and Craues to haue the meritt of the whole Cause, tryed by the Gouernor and Councell which was allowed, now James Veitch plt— James Veitch plt: The appeale againe read, to which the deft Hen: Tripp defendt pleads not Guilty And desires John Turners Oath may be taken who in open Court was sworne and saith I heard my Mastr Michael Brook say if he had not taken that Calfe for a debt he had not had any thinge he Came into the Country in No uembr last was twelue months and about that time this was done And further saith not— The deft desires Iudgmt of the Court Coil: William Euans opinion herein, is, that if James Veitch had any property or Claime to the said Cattle he would haue taken some Course to haue had them home in all this time— |
||||
Volume 49, Page 272 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.