| Volume 49, Page 272 View pdf image (33K) |
272 Provincial Court Proceedings, 1664.
Liber B B Veitch did know of it, and that to the best of my knowledge there is
an yearling and a Calf e of the encrease of this Cow, And that this
Cow had both eares Cropt, and did neuer take notice that it had
any other marke, And further saith not—
Demetrius Cartwright deposeth in Court saith that that Cow
which James Veitch Claimes is of the same marke the rest of his
Cattle (uizt) both eares Cropt and an half e moone cut out of the
upper part of the care, and that James Veitch did make demand of
this Cow, and her encrease, and Mr Tripp did deny to deliuer them,
and further saith not—
James Price deposeth in Court saith that this Deponant was not
att home, when the Cattle of Michael Brooks were appraysed, and
that James Veitch did desire me to goe into the penn to see the marke
of the Cow which he Claimed and I found the marke to be Cropt
on both cares and an halfe on the topp of each care and further
saith not
William Euans deposeth in Court saith that James Veitch made
demand of a Cow and her encrease that he said was his, of Henry
Tripp, and he said he would not deliuer them wthout Order of
Court and further saith not—
Hen: Tripp upon appeale plt : the foregoeing appeale undr the
James Veitch defendant Cla rkes hand of Caluert County
uide pete Court being read, which appeale was in Chancery, James Veitch the
322 cleft alleadgeth that the pit: could not appeale in Chancery by reason
there was no injunction on it therefore Craues a dissmission—
The Court adjournes till afternoone
againe rnett the Leiutennt Generall alsoe prsent But Mr White absent
by reason of his indisposedness in health
[p. 339] The foregoeing pit: and deft againe at the Board appearing Both
partyes Ioyne issue, and Craues to haue the meritt of the whole
Cause, tryed by the Gouernor and Councell which was allowed, now
James Veitch plt—
James Veitch plt: The appeale againe read, to which the deft
Hen: Tripp defendt pleads not Guilty And desires John Turners
Oath may be taken who in open Court was sworne and saith I heard
my Mastr Michael Brook say if he had not taken that Calfe for a
debt he had not had any thinge he Came into the Country in No
uembr last was twelue months and about that time this was done And
further saith not—
The deft desires Iudgmt of the Court
Coil: William Euans opinion herein, is, that if James Veitch had
any property or Claime to the said Cattle he would haue taken some
Course to haue had them home in all this time—
|
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Volume 49, Page 272 View pdf image (33K) |
|
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.