clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings of the Provincial Court, 1658-1662
Volume 41, Page 524   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


524 Provincial Court Proceedings, 1661.

Liber
P. C. R.

Gouernor and Councell and publiqe peace of this Province Yett
notwithstanding the said William Seely did the 18th day of the same
moneth mutinously and felloniously run away from of the said
Guard and from his said Leiuetennt contrary to the forme of diuers
Statutes in that case made and prouided and agt the peace of the
Lord Proprietary his rule and Gouernmt

Attorney
General v.
Ward

Then was read the Indictmt of Thomas Ward in his verbis &c.
The Jurors for the Lord Proprietary doe prsent Thomas Ward at
St Hieromes in the County of St Marys Planter that whereas the
said Thomas Ward being lawfully warned to attend on the Guard
on the 14th day of February anno 1660 by his Leiutennt Marks

Pheypo upon most urgent occasions both for the safety of the Gou-
ernor & Councell and peace of this Province Yett notwithstanding
the said Thomas Ward did on the 15th day of the same moneth fel-
loniously run away from off the Guard and from his said Leiuetennt
leaueing his Armes behinde him Contrary to the forme of diuers
Statutes in that case made and provided and agt the ....

p. 1015

The Jury retourned and brought in their uerdict William Seely
Guilty Thomas Ward not Guilty

Attorney
General v.
Seeley

Then was pesented the peticon of William Seely (vizt)
To the honoble the Gouernor and Councell of Maryland
The humble peticon of William Seely Sheweth That yor petr hath
been convicted this Courte for departure from service and certaine
words scattred from him which passes as mutinous
He humbly accknowledges his faulte and ignorance & declareth
that his misusage was very greate which caused him (not capable of
the danger thereof) to breake into some passionate expressions never
intending nor Knoweing what belonged to a mutiny and promiseth
euer to be warned not to neglect or refuse any future Service and
Comand And prayeth with all Contricon and hearty sorrow that yor
honors will be pleased to mittigate the Seuerity and Strictnes of such
punishmts as are by lawe prouided agt such offences and that his
ignorance and penitency may be by yor Honors taken notice of And
he shall pray &c.
Vpon the peticon abouesaid It is ordered that Wm Seely be par-
doned

Attorney
General v.

Came Mr Attorney Generall before the Grand jury & informes
them of a certaine weoman serut tht liued aboute two yeares since
with Mr Henry Coursey who had a Bastard whilst she liued there her
name the Informer knoweth not, nor what is become of the Child
nor the woman & the Ld Propr comands an accompt of both of
them



 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings of the Provincial Court, 1658-1662
Volume 41, Page 524   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives