Provincial Court Proceedings, 1660. 383

Richard Bently viij^o Dec 1660 demanded a writt ag^t Samuell
Graues to appeare the 11^th of December following to answere in an
action of debt

Warrant inde issued to the Sherriffe of Calvert County retorn
Court vt supra.

Liber
P. C. R.
Bently v.
Graves
8 Dec. 1660

The humble Petition of Richard Bently, Sheweth that Sam Graues
is indebted to your Petitioner two hundred Eighty Seuen pounds of
Tob by accompt, humbly Cranes order with Costs, And he shall
pray &c and 195^l of Tob.
The Plantiffe Richard Bently being sworne to his accompt and
the defendant Samuell Graues owneing an accompt to be due to the
plt. It is ordered by this Court that the defend^t shall pay to the p^h
ffower hundred and Seventeene pounds of Tob and Caske (with
Costs of Suite) w^ch appeared to be due.

p. 382

Ignatius ffenwick came this day and Chose Baker Brooke Esq^r
for his Guardian.

11 Dec. 1660
Re
Fenwick's
Guardian

To the honno^ble the Gouernor and Councell for the Province of
Maryland

The humble Petition of Nicholas Guyther

Humbly sheweth that your Petitioner the last Prouinciall Court
was ordered that the ffees relateing to the imprisonment of Mary
Clocker &c. were to be paid out of his Lo^ps Revenue, And whereas
the Assembly then sitting in the same Case with John Williams and
his wife did order the fees due from them to be paid out of that
County wherein they were attainted.
Now The humble request of your Petitioner is to haue the Judg-
ment of this Court where the said ffees for imprisonment as afore-
said shall iustly accrew, And your Pet^r as in duty bound shall euer
pray.
The Petitioner is to be satisfied out of Saint Maryes County when
he shall bring in his accompt to be leuyed with the publick leuyes.

Re
Gwyther's
Fees

To the honno^ble Gouernor & his Councell for the prouince of
Maryland

The humble Petition of Giles Sadlier

Most humbly sheweth that whereas John Bateman Esq^r Adminis-
trator of the Estate of Thomas Belcher deceased Did comand your
Petitioner to call a Court by vertue of the said Batemans warrant
issued the 25^th of December past for the which paines and dilligent
Care in the execution thereof your Pet^r demanded satisfaction of the
said Bateman who refuseth to make me your humble Petitioner
satisfaction without your honnors approbation, the which being

Sadler v.
Bateman
Vid. Judgm^t
of the Court
fo: 370