34 Provincial Court Proceedings, 1657-8.

Lib. B. No. 3

plantiff and She the Said M^rs Eltonhead defend' The Court doth
grant a Refference in that Suit untill march next, then to be finally
Determined.

Mullekin v.
Coursey

Refference is Granted between Iames Mullekin plf^t and m^r Henry
Coursey defendant untill march next

Smith v.
Brooke

Whereas Richard Smith hath Petitioned this Court for a debt of
three hundred pounds of Tobacco and Caske due from m^r Michaell
Brooke by Bill, and the Said m^r Brookes acknowledging the Said
Debt, The Court doth order that the Said m^r Brooke do Satisfie the
Said debt with Cost of Suit or Else Execution.

Hooper v.
Norton

Refference is Granted (with the Consent of both parties) unto m^r
Tobias Norton in a Suit depending between m^r Henry Hooper
plantiff and him the Said Norton defend^t untill the Court to be
holden in March next.

Guttridge v.
Jolly

Refference is Granted untill march next in a Suit depending
between Timothy Guttridge plantiff and Iames lolly defendant

Stagwell v.
Morgin

Nonsuit is Granted unto Cap^t Sampson Waring Attorny of
Thomas Stagewell ag^t Cap^t Phillip Morgin w^th Cost of Suit

Beckwith v.
Maddock

Nonsuit is Granted unto George Beckwith against Ann Mad-
dookes with Cost of Suit.

Stagwell v.
Thompson
p. 404

Nonsuit is Granted unto Cap^t Sampson Waring Attorney of
Thomas Stagwell against Iames Tompson with Cost of Suit

Watts v.
Dorrington

Thomas Plott aged twenty one yeares or thereabouts Sworne and
Examined in open Court Sayeth, That the Cannoe in dispute between
Alexander Watts and William Dorrington he this Deponent doth
know to be Alexander Watts, Ever Since the Said Watts bought
the Said Cannoe of an Indian which is about one year and a half
Since, And farther this Deponent Sayeth not Signum
Thomas X Plott

Barrett v.
Harwood

Whereas m^r Michael Brooke Attorney of William Barrett hath
Petitioned this Court for Seven hundred and Seventeen pounds of
Tobacco and Caske w^th forbearance for one year, wherein Phillip
Harwood Standeth indebted by Specialty for the payment of the
Same. The Court doth order that the Said Harwood Shall forthw^th
Satisfie the Said debt with Cost of Suit and forbearance or else
Execution