Provincial Court Proceedings, 1659. 285

It is therefore Ordered th^f the deft pay unto the pff Three barrells
of Corne eyther att his owne dwelling howse of S^t Johns or betwixt
his howse & S^t Hierom's w^thin one month.

Liber
P. C. R.

Calu^et County. Command William Dorington & Anne his Wife
to hould to Richard Smith of S^t Leonards Creek in Caluert County
in an accon of Couen^t to him the s^d Rich: Smith of One hund^d Acres
of Land, Lying on the West side of S^t Leonards Creeke (called
Smiths Joy) one dwelling howse, one quarter howse, & one Orchard,
Three Tob. howes &c :
Josias ffendall

And the finall Concord betweene the fores^d parties is, That the s^d
Richard Smith shall peaceabley enioy, the s^d hund^d Acres of Land,

Smith v.
Dorington

mentioned in a Patent or Graunt to him the s^d Will^m Dorington
bearing date the fowrth day of August 1658, & Lying on the West
side of S^t Leonards Creeke as afores^d w^th one dwelling howse, one
quarter howse, one Orchard & Three Tob-howses, to him & his
heyres or assignes for euer.

p. 248

Whereas James Veitch plf hath petitioned this Court agst John
Day, Alleaging how the s^d Day being arrested att the suite of Will^m
Chaplin, & refusing to putt in security to answere the s^d suite the plf
was obliged by uertue of his Sheriffs Office to secure the defts person
for one hund^d & seauen dayes, for w^ch he demands 2140^l Tob of the
deft. The deft sayth th^t he refused not to putt in Bayle: for hauing
occasion to goe ouer the Riuer about his affayres he profered him
M^r Tho. Thomas to be his Bayle; & th^t he remayned w^th the plf
about Ten dayes before he profered him this security, during w^ch
time the plf tended on him not aboue three dayes att the most, &
further th^t the plf permitted & allowed him to goe & stay att his owne
howse, (w^ch the plf himselfe acknowledgeth hee did)
The Judgm^t of the whole Board is, th^t the deft pay unto the plf

(for thoee three dayes hee tended on him, as his prisoner) sixty

pownds of Tob & noe more, & allso pay Costs of suite.
To the hon^ble the Leiuten^t & Councell of Maryland

Veitch v.
Day

The humble Petⁿ of Thomas Gerard Sheweth That John Jarbo,
& Walter Pakes being indebted ioyntly unto yo^r Pet^r by Bill Thir-
teene hund^d & Twelue pownds of Tob & cask, yo^r Pet^r hath seuerall
times demanded the same, yett they still putt of yo^r Pet^r w^th delayes,
much to his hinderance this yeare.
Hee humbly therefore Craueth Order for p^ent satisfaction &c :
To this demand Walter Hall deft sayth, That hee hath payd by
the plfs order to M^r Henry Meese seauen hund^d Twenty one pownds
in part of th^t Debt, as appeareth by his Receipt on the back side of

Gerard v.
Jarboe and
Hall