|
Corne-
waleys v.
Chandler
and Overzee
|
The defts alleaging tht they haue sufficiently answered the plfs
Bill in Chancery, & therefore need not putt in their answere to his
Reply, as it was Ordered.
The plf thereuppon, producing the Bill of Cott ffrancis Yardley &
Nathaniell Batts for 5000l Tob or Two Indian Slaues, dated 9th of
Decembr 1653, demands an Extent uppon the Land of the sd Cofi
ffrancis Yardley att Portoback, wch the deffts are now possecl wth.
To wch demand the defts alleage tht that Land att Portoback was
gyuen unto the defts by the sd Cott Yardleys Wife deceased & did not
(as is pretended) belong to him the sd Yardley, & therefore not
lyable to pay or satisfy his Debts, But it appearing to the Board by
the Records of this Prouince tht That Land was the sd Yardleys
Land. It is thereuppon Ordered tht the sd Land bee extended soe
far forth as to pay the plfs Debt amounting to fiue Thowsand pownds
of Tob & Cask. Writt Extent. Vid. fol. 218.
|
|