By the Lower House of Assembly Octobr the 24th 1724
May it please yor Honours
In Answer to your objections to the Supplementary Bill to
the Act for trying matters of ffact in the Counties &ca We
desire your Honours to consider first, that Bills of Exceptions
are only the Reducing matters given in Evidence to writing
while they are fresh in the memory of the Judges; which (we
conceive) cannot possibly be attended with any Inconve-
nience; but on the Contrary the Judges will have an oppor-
tunity of deliberately considering what the Law is upon such a
fact, and by that means prevent the mischieff, that may
happen either by the Jury's mistaking the weight & Effect of
the Evidence, their taking upon them the Determination of
Matters of Law (which they are not Judges of) and mis-
taking the Law, and the precipitancy of the Judges them-
selves; any of which may be the ruin of an Innocent man and
his family, or the means of a guilty persons escaping Just
punishmt Besides as it is the duty of the Judges to see that
nothing but truth be inserted, so it is the Duty of the Attorney
Generall or other Councill concern'd for his Lpp to see that
the Bills of Exception are regularly drawn. Secondly That
the allowing the associates Voices in Criminall Cases, is so
far from being an Innovation in the Brittish Constitution
(wch ought to be or pattern) that it is exactly agreeable to it
as appears by the fforms of the Commissions & writts of
Association. Thirdly, That the motives inducing this house
to desire the Justices of Oyer and Terminer should not Try
matters of ffact within the Cognisance of the County Courts
are first to prvent the sd Justices being hindred to proceed in
matters that must be Determined before them, and secondly
to lessen the Expence of poor people that may be either un-
justly accused or be Ignorant Transgressors, which we hope
may be provided for by a Clause in the Bill that nothing
Tryable by the County Court should be Tryable else where
Except in Cases of necessity or Doubt and that in all such
|