clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings of the Council of Maryland, 1761-1769
Volume 32, Page 228   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


228 Proceedings of the Council of Maryland, 1761-1769.

Lib. C. B.
No. 20

p. S. After the Debate in Whitaker's Case was over he
shewed Letters of Orders as his Qualification, which ap-
peared to be only Deacon's Orders, and on this Circumstance,
and his Counsel declaring that on the Account of his defective
Qualification they had hazarded the Matter on their Argu-
ment of Presumption, it was strongly recommended to have
the Question again brought on upon the Suit of the Sheriff's
Bond, but the affair was given up by the Adversaries. The
Declaration of his Counsel was owing to his having produced
his Letters of Orders when they advised him against it and
the Contemptuous manner in which he treated them on the
Occasion. I have Reason to know that the Man Loved Litiga-
tion, and it is not improbable that what he shewed was with
the view of bringing on a Suit and that he might have the
proper Qualification to produce when brought to the Necessity
of doing it, and perhaps if not a Knowledge a Suspicion of this
deterred his Antagonists.

Sir
We are favoured (as you say,) with a Copy of Mr Dulany's
Opinion, relative to the dispute subsisting between Our Parish
and you, which Opinion we have had before us and maturely
considered, We shall, as we ever did, pay great Respect to Mr
Dulany as a Gentleman, and One eminent in the Law, yet we
presume, should his Opinion differ on this Occasion with other
Gentlemen of the Law, and also from our own Sentiments we
would hope it might not be esteemed Criminal in us, and
should we attempt to pursue the legal Methods for a Candid
and fair determination of a Matter of so much Importance to
us, we cannot suppose, that, under a Colour of Supporting the
Authority and Rights of his Lordship, the Supreme Magis-
trate would so much interfere by any Vigorous proceedings as
should in any manner impede or give the least Colour of affect-
ing the Current of Justice or divert the least Rivulet thereof.
Such a Doctrine must sound harsh in the Ear of every Free-
man, much more of those who esteem themselves loyal Sub-
jects of the British King, and acknowledge his Sovereignty,
and depend on him for their protection both Civil and Re-
ligious.
We can assure Mr Dulany, that we have no Intention, nor
would we designedly do any Act of Outrage, or any thing that
should tend to give Colour for any Suspicion thereof, or would
we want the Reins of Government wrested out of the Hands
of those, who by the Laws of the Land, are intrusted with
them, but at the same time, we would not, by a Servile Sub-
mission, Alienate Our Rights and Liberties, and tamely give



 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings of the Council of Maryland, 1761-1769
Volume 32, Page 228   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives