clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings of the Council of Maryland, 1761-1769
Volume 32, Page 206   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


206 Proceedings of the Council of Maryland, 1761-1769.

Lib. J. R

&U. S

dont they sue me if they had any Cause of Action they would
long ago. The next is about One Saylor a Dutch Man I think
it was about four years ago One Leaser Sued him and was
brought before me, Leaser proved his Account and Saylor
made answer he had an Account to prove I asked him what it
was, he said it was for nursing Leaser in the Small Pox the
aforesaid Leaser had it very light and after he got well he
worked for him some time until Saylor was Satisfied for his
trouble then I asked Sayler if he did intend to charge Leaser
for the nursing of him at that time he made answer no if
Leaser had not Warranted him and made him Mad he would a
never said one Word about it so I think these trumpt Accounts
and especially of a long standing ought not to be allowed.
The next is about one Michael Creager a Worthless fellow
as far as I can learn he lives some distance from me but where
I know not, he pretends to prove his Assertion by some of his
own sort only Samuel Magruder Constable I asked him about
it he says he knows nothing of the matter its so far from my
receiving double fees for One Warrant I dont get Single fees.
I desire you will be so good as to send me three Summons's one
for Peter Shuman and one for John Furguson and another for
Thomas Johnson and appoint the first Wednesday in July for
a hearing, and in so doing you will very much Oblige Sir
30th April 1767. Your very humble Servant
To P: Bainbridge.
Upton Scott Esqr Clerk of the Council.

This is to Certify to his Excellency that I Philip Rodenpiller
and Peter Bainbridge have settled and made up all Our Ac-
counts to this Day and the said Rodenpiller has nothing
against the said Bainbridge being Continued in Commission,
as Witness my hand this 27th day of April 1767.
Philip Rodenpiller.

To His Excellency Horatio Sharpe Esqr Governor and Com-
mander in Chief in and over the Province of Maryland.

The humble Petition of the Inhabitants of Ketockton hun-
dred in Frederick County and Province aforesaid humbly
Sheweth.

That some time ago a certain Peter Shuman went about
with a Petition through the Neighbourhood and told some of
us that it was a Petition to send to the Governor in Order to
get a Dutch Justice, and others of us he told it was a Petition
for a Road, and since Capt Bainbridge has got the Petition
from Annapolis and Read it to us we declare that we know of
no such things as he is Charged with in the aforesaid Petition



 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings of the Council of Maryland, 1761-1769
Volume 32, Page 206   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives