clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings of the Council of Maryland, 1761-1769
Volume 32, Page 175   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

Proceedings of the Council of Maryland, 1761-1769. 175


Nicholas Paulas Matthew Walker
John Keller John Charlton
Ahram Keller Adam Kyle
Philip Ferver Peter Cregar
Joseph Collman Michael Cregar
Peter Boocher Willm Griffith
Conrod Young Jacob Sauler
Valentine Fiddler David Smith
Henry Lighter Philip Fogall
Christopher Smith Anthy Fogall
Valentine Mather Devault Wilyard
Philip Fink John Nal: Cart
Christt Michael Jacob Wiseman
Peter Waddle Correll Middart
Tobias Horine Michael Byer
Isaac Colvin Peter Coonce
Conrod Moser Joseph Byer
John Bell Philip Yonday
Samuel Thomas Christian Everhart
Peter Hargett Matthias Cost
Christ. Brown John Lighter

The Affirmation of Yost Blickenstaff taken before me the
Subscriber One of his Lordships Justices of the Peace for
Frederick County. That Whereas Mary Ann Cristy Abigail

Lib. J. R.

& U. S.

Debutts was in Possession of some Land and Tenements in
said County, which fell to her by Birth Right, and as her
Uncle Peter Bainbridge had a young Man at his House named
Samuel Armit that came from Philadelphia which said young
Man said that Bainbridge was a Cousin of his, and the
said Peter Bainbridge Represented this Armit to be a very
Rich Man and got him Married to this young Woman, and
after they were Married but a very little time he wanted to sell
a small Piece of Land which she Consented to and this Af-
firmer wanted to buy said Piece of Land, Set in Case he could
get a good Right to it, and said Bainbridge told this Affirmer
that Armit could give him a good Deed for said Land, but
this Affirmer was told by several People that Armit could not
give him a good Deed for it, Then said Bainbridge told him
and persuaded him that if Armit and his Wife would Enter
into an Obligation Bond of Performance without security that
it would be good, as the said Affirmer insisted for security so
that he bought said Land upon his Say so. Then said Armit
wanted to sell all the rest of her Lands and Tenements but
could not seeing his Wife was not willing nor could not make
a good Right and after that said affirmer had paid and made
Satisfaction for the Land the said Armit went off left his

p. 443



 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings of the Council of Maryland, 1761-1769
Volume 32, Page 175   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives