The houses reply to the answer of this Board upon the
Address in the case of lames Crawford was read, & referred
for further Answer.
By the House of Delegates March the 25: 98.
We haue Recd yr Exncys Answer to our Address in Rela-
con to his Majties Lawyers wherein your Exncy seems to reflect,
as if this house was partiall in rep'senting the Grievance of
this Province when at the same time Yr Excy is Sencible that
a Bill is passed by this House to prvent that Grievance you
make mention of in Yr Answer. As for his Majties Proroga-
tiue, We hope we shall haue regarde at all tymes as we shall
haue for our owne rights & Priviledges.
We were in great hopes to haue had a more Satisfactory
Answer from Yr Exncy upon So great an Infringment upon or
Rights and Libertyes, but we haue done our duty in reprsent-
ing the Same to your Exncy and shall proceed no further then
by leauing our Vote upon Iournll to assert tht Right &
Liberty wch before this time was never questioned from that .
very first Seating & Inhabiting this Province as to Yr Exncys
Demand, whether all the Membrs were privy and Consenting
to our Address is soe Unparliamentary that we must begg yr
Exncy to Excuse our not Answering. We are wth all Dutifull
respects Yr Exncys Most obe: Servt
Signed p Ordr
W Bladen Cl. Dom Del.
|