L. H. J.
|
Gentr If any man has or does desire freedome to Debate
at Randome without any regard to the Dignity of his Matytie
and honr of his Gov™' and under the nature of priviledge to
arraigne prerogative you cannot Expect but that his Excy will
deter such from their practices in order to prevent their pun-
ishment, nor can we in honr or in duty advise otherwise.
In your fourth Article you desire would receive into his
protection the Justices of peace and those that serve his Majty
for no reward.
You seem to intimate by this that the Justices are all out
Lawed for. all other psons are under his Majtis protection, and
his Excy has never restrained that protection either to Justices
or others so long as they carry themselves in dutifull obedi-
ence to his Matyy and his Laws.
Its true there has been severall Iustices lately Questioned
|
p. 263
|
for Leavying Tobo on his Majtys Subjects Contrary to Law
some of whome appeared inocent and were discharged and
others manefestly Guilty.
And are you in Earnest aggreived that those were Ques-
tioned for their misfeazance and the Country reimbursed the
Tobo so wrongfully taken from them, or must none be ques-
tioned though upon never so strong grounds but such as are
before hand proved Guilty.
We are sorry to find such an Arbitrary Tempr as Reigns in
some of you and that you can so easily disguise and Impose
it on others.
To Your fifth article desireing his Excy to abstaine from
calling the clks: of your Comittees (the clks: of the house you
mean) upon Oath to discover all done in it &c. You may be
sure we se through this disguise and pfectly understand what
you drive att. Why all this trouble and care to keep your
words and actions in the Darke, will not they endure the light,
if in your consultacons you proceed upon the rules of honr and
honestly, which in your Station you ought, what matter who
knows it.
But if under the pretence of serving your King and Country
in this Eminent Station, you are any of you manageing base
designes agt his Majtys Governmt and the Country, why should
not such thereby be detected and others thereby cautioned, but
it is plaine you would not have your words and Actions
knowne which is enough to cause suspicion, and its much
unlike those honble Gentn who you would equalize yorselves
wth the house of Comons who dayly make publick their votes
and proceedings.
Your sixth article abt Jury's which you say is a Bulwarke
agt Arbitrary Governmts and pray that no Jury's may at any
|