[Rev. Bennet Alien to Sharpe.]
Nov. 25. 1767
Sir
Inclos'd I send your Excellency the Agreement of the vestry
of St James's to my holding that parish together with St Ann's
upon my entering into articles to officiate duly there by myself
or a regular curate. Upon sounding the vestry of this parish
yesterday I found so much opposition from Mr Brice Worth-
ington alone that I thought it prudent to postpone the ques-
tion without putting it to a vote. Mr Walter Dulany (tho' not
personally present) had started an objection to the Legality
of the thing by a wretched quibble upon the word adjacent
in Sect. 16. of the act of 1701. He said, he would be deter-
min'd by the opinion of council ; I brought him the inclos'd
opinion of Mr Paca, which he treated with great contempt.
He referr'd me to Mr Johnson, because, as I may well pre-
sume Mr Johnson had been heard to say, if it were possible to
start any objection or give any turn to the words of the Act
so as to prevent a Parson's holding two livings he should be
glad to do it. Mr Brice Worthington (as hard as Iron) being
one of the vestry, had I believe met with his Colleague Mr
Johnson, & tho' he seem'd to take the proposal in a favorable
light when I mention'd it a few days ago to him, he came
fraught with all the cavil that Sophistry and malice could
invent. Mr Walter Dulany took up the affair from a Self-
interested view ; that of getting Mr Addison's Friend Mr
Boucher here & annexing the School to the living, tho' Mr
Daken came here by his particular Solicitations couch'd in
the strongest terms of encouragement, who has been always
very assiduous in his attendance on the duty of the School.
Mr W. Dulany seems to murmur that your promise to Mr
Addison's friend should not have taken place of my Lord's
Recommendation of me. I observ'd this was making a direct
attack upon my Lord's right of Patronage. He went farther
& said that my Lord might provide for a friend without break-
ing the laws of the province. Such an aspersion, & from Mr
Walter Dulany too ! & was by his Lordship's particular favour
in Possession of two of the most lucrative places in the pro-
vince. How unjust, how cruel, how ungrateful ! To break
the laws of the Province was never my Lord's intention, your
Excellency's, or mine. I believe in my conscience, & it is the
opinion of every un-prejudic'd Gentleman I have spoke to,
that the spirit of the Law, & the intention of the Legislature
is strictly complied with in the present case in point of con-
venient nearness ; the boundaries of the parishes being within
four miles of each other, & the churches not only nearer
together than those of many contiguous parishes, but even
|
Original.
|