clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Journal of the Maryland Convention July 26 to August 14, 1775
Journal and Correspondence of the Maryland Council of Safety, August 29, 1775 to July 6, 1776

Volume 11, Page 381   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

of the Council of Safety, 1775-76. 381


49. Q. The instructions are dated on the 14th & the Letr
also, how account for it.
A. It was a mistake they ought to have been dated on
Monday the 15th
50. Q. By your letter to the Gent of Baltimore the tender
was to be under their direction did you expect they were to
mix with the Council :
A. My letter to the Gentlemen of Baltimore will shew that
was not my intention, I imagined that on so important an
affair they would confer with them on the subject :
51. Q. Why was Capt Smith to consult with the Genl of
Baltimore
A. I refered him to those gentlemen, expecting they would
carry him to the Council under whose direction I expected he
would be after his arrival at Annapolis.
52. Q. You say you wrote to your friends that the council
behaved with spirit on the late alarm.
A. I am certain I did to several & observed the happy
effects of it in rousing the whole province.
53. Q. Mr Carroll, the instructions were got by Chance to
my certain knowledge.
A. I neither gave Captn Smith directions to shew his orders
nor forbid him to do it.
54. Q. Did you inclose the Packet to Phil" in a letter of
yours.
A. No.
55. Q. Why was so much respect shewn to the Council of
Safety of Virginia & not to the President of the Congress.
A. A single Gentleman was very sufficient to carry a
packet to the congress & bring back their dispatches. It was
thought probable the Council of Safety would choose to confer
with the members of the Baltimore committee on so interest-
ing a subject as that contained in the papers which they car-
ried. And it was to them, not the Council of Virginia the
respect was intended.
56. Q. did you not cover the letter from the congress :
A. I did, & my reason was, that the packet from con-
gress being endorsed with Mr Hancocks name & the public
curiosity being at that time great to know what was in agita-
tion I feared the express or some other person who might see
the packet would be tempted by curiosity to open it; there-
fore put it under a new cover, directed to the Council, expect-
ing it would pass as an ordinary Packet from the Committee.
To obviate all suspicions of my having opened it, which I pre-
sume is implyed in yr question, I could have no temptation to
do so base an action. The dispatch from congress to our
committee informed us, they had sent orders to the Council

C. S. J.



 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Journal of the Maryland Convention July 26 to August 14, 1775
Journal and Correspondence of the Maryland Council of Safety, August 29, 1775 to July 6, 1776

Volume 11, Page 381   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives