Volume 4, Page 530 View pdf image (33K) |
530 Court and Testamentary Business, 1649.
Liber A. Beniamin Gill plte The pltes suite being for to haue the Gabriell Odgers deft possion of Mr Neales House and Plantacon wth the defendt vniustly deteines from him as hee alleadgeth. Mr Richard Browne Attorney for the deft saith the deft is will ing to deliver vpp the possion thereof to the plte at Christmas next, onely desires leave to continue there till then for his better conveniency of removeing wch the plte assenting vnto It is therevppon ordered that the defendant shall at Christmas next deliver vpp vnto the Plaintiffe the possession of the House and land in question.
Elias Beach plte The Complte sueth to bee releived against Henry Adams deft the deft in an Accon of trespasse for taking away his Boate from his landing place without Leave or licence and contrary to his appointrnt and making vse thereof to the pltes damage of 500 l of Tob: To the defendt confesseth the taking away of the Boate, but saith the plte was nothing damnified thereby, for that hee did but directly crosse the Creeke there with and imediately returned it againe to the place from whence bee tooke it. And that bee conceived bee had the pltes leave therevnto, ffor demanding a passage the plte tould the deft bee would Willingly give him passage, but hee thought his Boate was Leaky and would not swimme. And the pltes Attorney not being able to prove any dammage desires respite till the next Court that bee might bee farther instructed for that purpose But the defendt craveth Justice. Where vppon after long debate Thomas Greene Esqr the prsent Gov ernor declareth as followeth That the defendt ought to bee dismissed without day for that the plte was not able to make proofe of any the least part of the prtended damages And further declareth also that the Cause ought not to bee respited, p. 307 for that the defendt lyeing vnder Arrest these six monethes vppon this onely Cause, and the parties by whom the plte should prove his prtended damage as is alleadged are and haue beene still living within one Mile of the plte and within 2 miles of the Office and the Court, without ever having them sumoned therevnto as hee ought to haue done, and therevppon conceives it to bee a meer delay of Justice if such respite should bee admitted or granted And also for that the pltes Attorney declared openly in Court that the plte himself had never pceeded in this Cause against the defendt had hee not beene enticed & Counselled therevnto by some ill Neighbors about him And that withall the Reference desired was soe desired by the plte onely that the Cause might bee tryed by another Judge, as by oath of the pltes Attorney doth appeare Which to admitt of will not onely bee a wilfull delay of Justice but also secretly to adrnitt a corrupcdn in the prsent Judge much to the
|
||||
Volume 4, Page 530 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.