Volume 4, Page 488 View pdf image (33K) |
488 Court and Testamentary Business, 1649.
Liber A. 2da Junij Be it knowen vnto all men by these prsents that I William Bretton of Newtowne in the Province of Maryland gent have sold and delivered and by these prsents doe sell deliver and make over vnto Richard Bennett of the same place Planter for a valuable consideracon two Cowes and two bull Calfes by theire sides marked with my owne proper Marke viz, over and vnderkeeld the right Eare (comonly called a ifiower de Luce) and cropt on the left Eare. named Good Luck being five or six yeares old, and Small Cole being three or fower yeares old And further I the said William Bretton doe hereby Warrant & mainetaine the sale of the said Cattle vnto him the said Richard Bennett his heires or Assignes for ever against all lust claymes in Lawe Whatsoever Witnes my hand Willm Bretton Testes Richard Browne At a Court held at St Maries Venris Thomas Greene Esqr Governor primo Junij 1649 prsent Capt John Price Mr Thomas Hatton Hatton Secretary
Vppon the Accon of Phillipp Land Plte vrsus Mrs Margaret Brent deft being for 301 l of Tob: and caske due vppon Accompt, the defendant confessing the debt The Court doth order that shee make paymt thereof.
In the Cause betwixt Marks Pheypo and Nicholas Keeten pltes and ffrancis Pope deft being for a parcell of land for wch the plte Pheypo alleadgeth hee had a Warrant of Survey wch (as appeared) was not executed, but the same was afterward surveyed and laid out for the deft who hath built and cleered therevppon. The Court sawe noe cause to releive the plte herein And ordered that the Cause should stand dismissed.
In the Cause betwixt Marks Pheypo and Nicholas Keeten pites against James Johnson deft, the matter of Complaint being vppon the same grounds as that against ffrances Pope The Court likewise ordered that the same should bee dismissed.
The matter in question betweene Mrs Margarett Brent on the behaulf of Mrs Ewre plf and Anthony Rawlins deft being for a Heifer wch as the plfe alleadgeth the deft had by a private Conveyance from Wm Hardwich and wch did never belong to the said Hardwich or Thomas Sturman but as she probably beleiveth vnto Mr Ewre. Vppon debate whereof and vppon p. 252 oath made This Court conceived there was some probability that the said Heifer was one of Mrs Ewres stock and might have beene heretofore plundred, and doth therefore order that the said William Hardwich shall by Michas next
|
||||
Volume 4, Page 488 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.