Court and Testamentary Business, 1643. 205

          mr Secret  And vpon the oath of the plf that at the                            Liber P. R.

       Sedent

       Ja: Neale. entry of this action on the 11. nov: last

       Angud baker ought him 300 l tob & that he had received since

       no more toward it then 200 l tob: the Court found that he

       should recover 100 l tob of the said Jo: rnottram.

         Tho: Carey prayed to be admitted to make further proofe

       agst humphrey Chaplin, & produced the returne of the Com

       mission for the swearing of Anne Thomson:

         And vpon the reading of the evidence the Court found for

       the said Thomas Carey, that he should recover the service of

       humphrey Chaplin till the 14th of March next, and (with consent

       of the defts attorny Edw. packer) two months after the said 14th

       of march, (cont 58 dales) in recompence of damage for his

       absence since the last of Aprill.

         Giles Brent Esq p attornat Edw. packer demandeth of Tho:

       wetherley 4. bushells of English meale, for wch he received as

       price thereof in hand, 2. hh. tob. cont 500' tob at the least;

         warrt to the defendt to shew cause at Court forthwith.

         the said Tho: Wetherly came & saith that the tob was not

       merchantable, & the plf not being able to depose of the

       goodnes of the tob nor that the defendt tooke it for good or

       bad, the defendt was admitted to his oath, vpon whose oath

       that william Nauphone the seller of the tobacco did say to him

       of one of the hogsheads that it was as good below as at the

       top, wch the dept saw, & that it would make vp it selfe, & the

       rest that was good of the other hogshead; & that there was

       no more of it vsible then about 200 Wt

         whereas nathan: Pope hath petitiond the Court that he may

       have the bodies of 3. maidservs of Sr Edmond Ployclon delivered

       to his custody to carry downe to St Edmond in virginea the

       Court can find it no way iust to allow his said petition in

       regard the petr can shew no authorisemt from Sr Edmond to

       demand or receive them; besides that by a letter of attorny to

        Giles Brent Esq dated 26. march last it appeares to the

       Court that the said Giles Brent is authorised by the said Sr

       Edmond to demand & take into his custody the said servants

       But by reason of mr brents absence in Kent no demand yet

       either by the said Giles brent or any other on the said Sr

       Edmonds behalfe hath beene made to this govermt for the said

       servants; and whensoever they shalbe lawfully demanded, the

       Court wilbe ready to doe for Sr Edmond, all that to right &

       iustice shall apperteine.