|
U. H.
Journal
1659-69
p. 202
|
Henry Spinke plt The plts petn being the same putt
Doctor Luke Barker deft) in by him last Proall Court now read
in Court the deft in answere thereto putteth in this his answere
& also the Charge which are as followeth.
To the Rt honoble the Leiutennt Generall
and Councell of Maryland
The humble petn of Luke Barber by way
of answere to the petn or declaracon
of Henry Spinke
Sheweth
That whereas the sd Spinke accuseth yor petr of calling his
wife Ellinor whore itt is true he denyeth itt not, nor any parte
or parcell of the sd Charges of immodest and lascivious Car-
ryages of the sd Ellinor as they are charged & Contayned in
the aforesd petn or declaracon and relating in the least to the
said Ellinor but pleades a speciall Justificacon as not actionable
humbly throwing himselfe and Case vpon this most honoble
Court & their Judgement whither any of the sd words are
actionable yor petr humbly Conceiving with Submission to yor
honors they are not & then Conceives vnder the submission
aforesaid a Jury ought not nor can have Cognizance thereof
for ad Questionem Legis Judices ad questionem facte Juratores
The prmisses Considered yor petr humbly
Craves such Releife for his vnjust molestacon
as yor honors thinke meete
And as in duty bound he shall
pray &c.
The Charge
That Doctor Luke Barber did call Ellinor the now wife of
Henry Spinke whore that he did divers tymes affirme that she
was a Whore & that he had taken her with her Coates vp and
that Rogue Thomas Hughes with his breeches downe. And
that he brought none but Rogues and Whores out of England
|
|