Gibson/Papenfuse
Race and the Law in Maryland

Image No: 324   Enlarge and print image (92K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>

clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Gibson/Papenfuse
Race and the Law in Maryland

Image No: 324   Enlarge and print image (92K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>

Immigrants and Their Increase 89 FIGURE 4.1. Population Growth in Virginia and Maryland, 1607-1700 historians have given it scarcely more attention than did the Board of Trade.2 Wesley Frank Craven is an exception. In a recent essay, Craven argued that the population of Virginia in 1700 was at most only equal to the total number of immigrants in the seventeenth century.3 Is Craven correct? Did continuous waves of new settlers obscure a failure to achieve reproduc- tive increase in the seventeenth century? If so, why? When and why did natural population growth begin? This essay, using evidence drawn princi- pally from Maryland sources, addresses these questions. Only the Euro- pean immigrant experience is considered. Africans, who had a broadly sim- ilar demographic history, have been discussed elsewhere.4 Although Craven's argument is persuasive, his evidence is inadequate. His principal source is the record of headright grants kept by the clerks of Virginia land office. His conclusion rests on a comparison of the total num- ber of grants before 1700 with estimates of total population in 1700. How- ever, as Craven notes, the record of headrights is not a fully reliable guide ^ =;'- .'- •-