Gibson/Papenfuse
Race and the Law in Maryland

Image No: 17   Enlarge and print image (76K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>

clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Gibson/Papenfuse
Race and the Law in Maryland

Image No: 17   Enlarge and print image (76K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>

compensate her master by any addition of time for her service. Further, the expense of food, clothing, and shelter for the child would be borne by the master, for the mother would never become independent and thus able to supply sustenance from her own goods. This would contribute to a belief by the master that the child "owed" him something.84 These factors combined to produce an assertion by the master of ownership of the slave's issue. Since slavery did not exist as a recognized status in England, there was of course no common law on the status of a slave's child. Once more, a legal system in which judges and lawyers were drawn from the servant holding group could be relied upon to be sympathetic to the interests of the master. Analytically, these three aspects of slavery are distinct: coercion rather than contract leading to servitude, lifetime service, and slave status of children. They were concrete resolutions of status issues that arose at different periods of time. Acceptance of coercion as the basis for servitude arose when the first African was purchased. The unlimited period of service would arise only when the African ran away or protested that his service extended beyond that of the white servant working next to him. The status of the child need not be decided until black children were bom and either involved in a legal transaction like the Fenwick indenture or reached an age where they were capable of living independently. The extended time frame for the consequences of slavery to manifest themselves should not obscure the perception that the same economic, social and legal forces were at work. C. Slavery in a Society of Indentured Servants Although the fundamental characteristics of slavery ~ involuntary hereditary perpetual servitude — were established in Maryland before the middle of the seventeenth century, it was a very different relationship that it later became. In seventeenth century Maryland, slavery was a peripheral institution. White indentured servants provided the majority of the work force and blacks constituted only ten per cent of the population at the close of the century.85 The plantation society with large numbers of slaves managed by an overseer responsible to the owner was a feature of the next century. There were very few negroes in Maryland prior to 1660 (perhaps three per cent of the population).86 In the period from 1658 to 1670 only fifteen of one hundred and fifty estates inventoried at the owner's death listed slaves, either black or indian. One had thirteen slaves, the next highest had six slaves, and the majority of the small number of slaveowners had only one slave. The number of white servants far exceeded the number of slaves, but again the totals were small.87 The circumstances of initial settlement of Lord Baltimore's province favored the importation of white servants over black laborers. Captain Robert Wintour's letter in 1635 urging a friend to come to the new proprietary colony, suggested that gentlemen bring with them about fifteen servants.88 Poverty stricken whites abounded, but there were few Africans living in seventeenth century England. A gentleman departing from England could readily find white servants who would contract to serve a period of years in hopes of later establishing themselves as independent planters when their service ended. For the master, the contractual arrangement was familiar, and it was useful 15