Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 473
   Enlarge and print image (61K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 473
   Enlarge and print image (61K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
473 Black communities of Baltimore as members of these communities went to fight, be wounded, and die in Europe and the Pacific. The national emergency also brought new changes and opportunities, and gave the social movements based in these communities new leverage. One crucial change was the mass induction of African American men (and, less permanently, white women) into industry. In the ensuing years, the racial division of labor would be severely disrupted, and, while Jim Crow in industry was not abolished, it was forced to retreat dramatically. Not surprisingly, this retreat was not automatic, but the product of concerted social struggle. In this struggle, the Baltimore Black freedom movement became far more industrially- and economically-oriented than it had been in the late 1930s. Likewise, the Baltimore workers* movement, particularly the CIO, had to grapple with the struggle against racism everywhere it organized as Black workers appeared throughout the plants and the shipyards - and as some white workers responded with escalating "hate" actions that threatened the union movement. And both movements had to confront the amazingly rigid opposition of industrial capital in Baltimore to the hiring of African American women outside the cafeteria and custodial departments; this opposition was so strong that industrialists were, by 1944, allowing a dangerous labor shortage in Baltimore war industries to develop, while Black women went unemployed and underemployed. Under these new conditions, and with these new imperatives, a new convergence between the Baltimore freedom and workers' movements indeed did occur in the early 1940s. This was not the same sort of convergence that appeared in 1934, when groupings of radicals from each emerging movement gravitated toward each other and began to work together. While radicals were involved in the 1940s, the convergence of these years was more a deepening alliance between important sections of the main leaderships of, by then, far more mature movements. And after 1941, this evolving alliance was augmented from another