Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 144
   Enlarge and print image (59K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 144
   Enlarge and print image (59K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
144 with these officials. Another occurrence that illustrated both the apprehension and somewhat contradictory attitudes towards the party among city officials, was the George Turnipseed affair. As was often its practice, the Baltimore CP openly refused to apply for a permit for the March 6 demonstration, citing its right to free speech. However, shortly before the demonstration, a George Turnipseed allegedly appeared at City Hall in the company of a police sergeant, applied for, and received a parade permit in the name of the Communist Party. The police thereby claimed that the demonstration was in complete accordance with the law. The party, though, later claimed that it had never heard of Turnipseed, Turnipseed's address turned out to be fictitious, and he could not be found by the press. Subsequently there was quite a bit of guffawing by the authorities and the press over how cleverly the party had been handled. The incident even became a minor piece of establishment folklore, humorously retold several times over the decades in the newspapers. Official frivolity, however, could not entirely obscure the fact that city government had chosen to back down from a party challenge. And the fact that the fictitious George Turnipseed was said to be Black, is indicative that, in official circles at least, Communism had become firmly linked with interracial ism. 9 Baltimore Communists continued to participate in national unemployed actions, using, for example, the passage of the National Hunger Marchers through Baltimore on their way to Washington, D.C. at the ends of both 1931 and 1932, as an opportunity for local mobilization. But on the whole during the years following the March 6 demonstration, the party's unemployed work was more local in character.^ One tactic that was used numerous times by the party-led Unemployed Councils was escorting groups of unemployed to relief offices to demand relief, then mounting soap-boxing rallies and demonstrations if they were refused. Usually these actions were brief and were, in effect, a form of militant advocacy for